Problem?RaleighApp27609 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 11:40 amSharing that positive energy again I see.bcoach wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:49 amHe is no Jerry Moore.AppWyo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:46 amJerry Moore did that once...bcoach wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:35 amWell I am giving the man a chance, but if we lose to GS two times in one year I will hate him for the rest of my life.ASUFan4863 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:20 am
Not much considering we’ve had our fair share of embarrassment the last few years.
Birmingham Bowl
-
bcoach
- Posts: 4976
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1660 times
- Been thanked: 1862 times
Re: Birmingham Bowl
-
RaleighApp27609
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2023 10:21 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 176 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
-
bcoach
- Posts: 4976
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1660 times
- Been thanked: 1862 times
-
Seattleapp
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:00 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 5312 times
- Been thanked: 1472 times
Re: Birmingham Bowl
Geez man. You started it with your snide comment then that’s how you follow up his response post?
-
Stonewall
- Posts: 7500
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3640 times
- Been thanked: 4742 times
-
ericsaid
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 89 times
- Been thanked: 487 times
Re: Birmingham Bowl
My auto-bid bit was a typo. 20 autobids, 1 for each G5 conference, while the P's will adjust based on a coefficient ranking based on performance.mike87 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 2:14 pmI could throw a couple stones at the redshirt and playoff part but this is good. Amazing what a little common-sense injection could do.ericsaid wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 1:27 pmWant to transfer? You have to be bought out or the program you’re leaving has to be paid a fee. Soccer has been doing this since it went professional in the early 20th century. It isn’t hard.
No free transfers unless the school releases you from your contract. If another program wants you there, they have to coordinate with the program, and the player agent needs to negotiate with each of the programs to determine an adequate transfer fee.
No lore free asset transfers. That’s what players are, they are assets. They lost the ability to be considered solely “players” or “students” once revenue share began. Now they are assets to be bought and sold and they did this to themselves.
Three year contracts, five years to play with no Redshirt rule. At the end of three you can transfer fee free. Any time before that and you either can be released and bought out by your program or a program you want to transfer to has to negotiate a fee.
This rewards programs who have great talent identification and ensures that those programs can then go out and get replacements without purely relying on television, student fees, or taxpayer funds.
For the playoff? 10 autobids with a reevaluation after each season to change who gets how many bids, for a total of 20. No more subjective, back room horse trading on playoff spots. Each G5 conference gets a bid, and the conferences in the P’s get a set number based on order of finish. Remove the rankings completely for anything other than seeding.
This turns the playoff into a tournament worthy of respect and above repudiation as there will be nothing subjective. It brings meaning to each FBS conference and will drive value up in television across the board as every game has the potential to matter.
I’ll probably be flamed for this post but, one last thing. There needs to be an anti-trust exemption given to the NCAA so that they can enforce the rules that govern hundreds of taxpayer funded athletics programs. Right now it’s a siphon on we, the people, and it’s corruption bordering on an oligarchical movement right now. It isn’t free enterprise and it isn’t a “free market”. Hardly anyone fully supports unrestricted markets. There has to be guardrails, unless everyone is acting in good faith and even Adam Smith recognized this.
My idea will never be implemented and even if it is, in part, it won’t be for another 20 years.
Sorry for the wall of text guys and I know a lot of you will disagree but it really is the only thing I can think of that stabilizes the sport while providing reasonable guard rails, post season expectations, and retains the importance of the regular season.
-
Apptrain
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:59 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 164 times
Re: Birmingham Bowl
It makes too much common sense to happen. Wish it would and in a timely fashion so maybe I can enjoy college football again before I'm gone.ericsaid wrote: ↑Fri Dec 19, 2025 3:01 pmMy auto-bid bit was a typo. 20 autobids, 1 for each G5 conference, while the P's will adjust based on a coefficient ranking based on performance.mike87 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 2:14 pmI could throw a couple stones at the redshirt and playoff part but this is good. Amazing what a little common-sense injection could do.ericsaid wrote: ↑Thu Dec 18, 2025 1:27 pmWant to transfer? You have to be bought out or the program you’re leaving has to be paid a fee. Soccer has been doing this since it went professional in the early 20th century. It isn’t hard.
No free transfers unless the school releases you from your contract. If another program wants you there, they have to coordinate with the program, and the player agent needs to negotiate with each of the programs to determine an adequate transfer fee.
No lore free asset transfers. That’s what players are, they are assets. They lost the ability to be considered solely “players” or “students” once revenue share began. Now they are assets to be bought and sold and they did this to themselves.
Three year contracts, five years to play with no Redshirt rule. At the end of three you can transfer fee free. Any time before that and you either can be released and bought out by your program or a program you want to transfer to has to negotiate a fee.
This rewards programs who have great talent identification and ensures that those programs can then go out and get replacements without purely relying on television, student fees, or taxpayer funds.
For the playoff? 10 autobids with a reevaluation after each season to change who gets how many bids, for a total of 20. No more subjective, back room horse trading on playoff spots. Each G5 conference gets a bid, and the conferences in the P’s get a set number based on order of finish. Remove the rankings completely for anything other than seeding.
This turns the playoff into a tournament worthy of respect and above repudiation as there will be nothing subjective. It brings meaning to each FBS conference and will drive value up in television across the board as every game has the potential to matter.
I’ll probably be flamed for this post but, one last thing. There needs to be an anti-trust exemption given to the NCAA so that they can enforce the rules that govern hundreds of taxpayer funded athletics programs. Right now it’s a siphon on we, the people, and it’s corruption bordering on an oligarchical movement right now. It isn’t free enterprise and it isn’t a “free market”. Hardly anyone fully supports unrestricted markets. There has to be guardrails, unless everyone is acting in good faith and even Adam Smith recognized this.
My idea will never be implemented and even if it is, in part, it won’t be for another 20 years.
Sorry for the wall of text guys and I know a lot of you will disagree but it really is the only thing I can think of that stabilizes the sport while providing reasonable guard rails, post season expectations, and retains the importance of the regular season.
-
Cro-Magnon App
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2016 4:25 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Western South Carolina
- Has thanked: 664 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Birmingham Bowl
Taylor said “I never thought we’d be punished for being in a bowl game by being leveraged …”. Sad times.