Birmingham Bowl

bcoach
Posts: 4976
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1660 times
Been thanked: 1862 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by bcoach » Thu Dec 18, 2025 3:35 pm

RaleighApp27609 wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 11:40 am
bcoach wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:49 am
AppWyo wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:46 am
bcoach wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:35 am
ASUFan4863 wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:20 am


Not much considering we’ve had our fair share of embarrassment the last few years.
Well I am giving the man a chance, but if we lose to GS two times in one year I will hate him for the rest of my life.
Jerry Moore did that once...
He is no Jerry Moore.
Sharing that positive energy again I see.
Problem?

RaleighApp27609
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2023 10:21 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 176 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by RaleighApp27609 » Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:45 pm

Nothing a username block can't fix.

bcoach
Posts: 4976
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1660 times
Been thanked: 1862 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by bcoach » Thu Dec 18, 2025 5:29 pm

RaleighApp27609 wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:45 pm
Nothing a username block can't fix.
OK

Seattleapp
Posts: 1989
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:00 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 5312 times
Been thanked: 1472 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by Seattleapp » Thu Dec 18, 2025 6:09 pm

RaleighApp27609 wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:45 pm
Nothing a username block can't fix.
Geez man. You started it with your snide comment then that’s how you follow up his response post?

Stonewall
Posts: 7500
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 3640 times
Been thanked: 4742 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by Stonewall » Thu Dec 18, 2025 9:08 pm

Time to bring back two way players. A team of them.

ericsaid
Posts: 1879
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 89 times
Been thanked: 487 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by ericsaid » Fri Dec 19, 2025 3:01 pm

mike87 wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 2:14 pm
ericsaid wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 1:27 pm
AtlAppMan wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:57 am


I also saw what Drink said about similar topic.

The system is broken and not sustainable. It has to be fixed
Want to transfer? You have to be bought out or the program you’re leaving has to be paid a fee. Soccer has been doing this since it went professional in the early 20th century. It isn’t hard.

No free transfers unless the school releases you from your contract. If another program wants you there, they have to coordinate with the program, and the player agent needs to negotiate with each of the programs to determine an adequate transfer fee.

No lore free asset transfers. That’s what players are, they are assets. They lost the ability to be considered solely “players” or “students” once revenue share began. Now they are assets to be bought and sold and they did this to themselves.

Three year contracts, five years to play with no Redshirt rule. At the end of three you can transfer fee free. Any time before that and you either can be released and bought out by your program or a program you want to transfer to has to negotiate a fee.

This rewards programs who have great talent identification and ensures that those programs can then go out and get replacements without purely relying on television, student fees, or taxpayer funds.

For the playoff? 10 autobids with a reevaluation after each season to change who gets how many bids, for a total of 20. No more subjective, back room horse trading on playoff spots. Each G5 conference gets a bid, and the conferences in the P’s get a set number based on order of finish. Remove the rankings completely for anything other than seeding.


This turns the playoff into a tournament worthy of respect and above repudiation as there will be nothing subjective. It brings meaning to each FBS conference and will drive value up in television across the board as every game has the potential to matter.


I’ll probably be flamed for this post but, one last thing. There needs to be an anti-trust exemption given to the NCAA so that they can enforce the rules that govern hundreds of taxpayer funded athletics programs. Right now it’s a siphon on we, the people, and it’s corruption bordering on an oligarchical movement right now. It isn’t free enterprise and it isn’t a “free market”. Hardly anyone fully supports unrestricted markets. There has to be guardrails, unless everyone is acting in good faith and even Adam Smith recognized this.


My idea will never be implemented and even if it is, in part, it won’t be for another 20 years.

Sorry for the wall of text guys and I know a lot of you will disagree but it really is the only thing I can think of that stabilizes the sport while providing reasonable guard rails, post season expectations, and retains the importance of the regular season.
I could throw a couple stones at the redshirt and playoff part but this is good. Amazing what a little common-sense injection could do.
My auto-bid bit was a typo. 20 autobids, 1 for each G5 conference, while the P's will adjust based on a coefficient ranking based on performance.

Apptrain
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:59 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 164 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by Apptrain » Fri Dec 19, 2025 4:49 pm

ericsaid wrote:
Fri Dec 19, 2025 3:01 pm
mike87 wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 2:14 pm
ericsaid wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 1:27 pm
AtlAppMan wrote:
Thu Dec 18, 2025 10:57 am


I also saw what Drink said about similar topic.

The system is broken and not sustainable. It has to be fixed
Want to transfer? You have to be bought out or the program you’re leaving has to be paid a fee. Soccer has been doing this since it went professional in the early 20th century. It isn’t hard.

No free transfers unless the school releases you from your contract. If another program wants you there, they have to coordinate with the program, and the player agent needs to negotiate with each of the programs to determine an adequate transfer fee.

No lore free asset transfers. That’s what players are, they are assets. They lost the ability to be considered solely “players” or “students” once revenue share began. Now they are assets to be bought and sold and they did this to themselves.

Three year contracts, five years to play with no Redshirt rule. At the end of three you can transfer fee free. Any time before that and you either can be released and bought out by your program or a program you want to transfer to has to negotiate a fee.

This rewards programs who have great talent identification and ensures that those programs can then go out and get replacements without purely relying on television, student fees, or taxpayer funds.

For the playoff? 10 autobids with a reevaluation after each season to change who gets how many bids, for a total of 20. No more subjective, back room horse trading on playoff spots. Each G5 conference gets a bid, and the conferences in the P’s get a set number based on order of finish. Remove the rankings completely for anything other than seeding.


This turns the playoff into a tournament worthy of respect and above repudiation as there will be nothing subjective. It brings meaning to each FBS conference and will drive value up in television across the board as every game has the potential to matter.


I’ll probably be flamed for this post but, one last thing. There needs to be an anti-trust exemption given to the NCAA so that they can enforce the rules that govern hundreds of taxpayer funded athletics programs. Right now it’s a siphon on we, the people, and it’s corruption bordering on an oligarchical movement right now. It isn’t free enterprise and it isn’t a “free market”. Hardly anyone fully supports unrestricted markets. There has to be guardrails, unless everyone is acting in good faith and even Adam Smith recognized this.


My idea will never be implemented and even if it is, in part, it won’t be for another 20 years.

Sorry for the wall of text guys and I know a lot of you will disagree but it really is the only thing I can think of that stabilizes the sport while providing reasonable guard rails, post season expectations, and retains the importance of the regular season.
I could throw a couple stones at the redshirt and playoff part but this is good. Amazing what a little common-sense injection could do.
My auto-bid bit was a typo. 20 autobids, 1 for each G5 conference, while the P's will adjust based on a coefficient ranking based on performance.
It makes too much common sense to happen. Wish it would and in a timely fashion so maybe I can enjoy college football again before I'm gone.

Cro-Magnon App
Posts: 1176
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2016 4:25 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Western South Carolina
Has thanked: 664 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by Cro-Magnon App » Fri Dec 19, 2025 5:00 pm

Taylor said “I never thought we’d be punished for being in a bowl game by being leveraged …”. Sad times.

Pikapp79
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2022 11:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Re: Birmingham Bowl

Post by Pikapp79 » Fri Dec 19, 2025 5:11 pm

Don’t change a thing until the system implodes.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”