We are in need of someone to take over the maintenance of the MMB. Yosef has done it for a long time, and we are grateful for all he has done, but life happens and he no longer has the time to devote to its upkeep. If anyone here is interested in helping to keep the board running, please let me know via DM.

Fans next game

User avatar
McLeansvilleAppFan
Posts: 9528
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
Has thanked: 4473 times
Been thanked: 2235 times

Re: Fans next game

Unread post by McLeansvilleAppFan » Thu Oct 01, 2020 7:32 pm

clemmonsapp wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 5:44 pm


Perhaps the difference with outdoor events with over 10,000 normal capacity is the difficulty of maintaining adequate standards of distance at ingress, egress, restrooms, concessions and common areas.
I am willing to bet good money this is a very large part of it.

This is a multi-variable problem and some of it is plain guess-work I imagine. Not a blind, "throw a dart at a dartboard and see what comes up" type of guess, but something with some very squishy numbers that just are not exact. I doubt we have much data on putting people in a stadium and seeing how Covid spreads. A study like this would be full of ethic violations. Call it chaos theory. That is OK. Should it be 7% or 8% or 10%. That could be some guess work. I doubt it should be 30%.

Fire codes and such are run through an equation, I assume, that takes into account the number of seats and location and number of egress stations and some other variables. More than a few variables I would think and I bet in some of those variables we go with some gut hunches and consensus of the Fire Marshall community without a ton of hard data that says one thing or something different as to how much weight to give one variable or another.

This is no different at some level.
This is my very generic signature added to each post.

mountaineerman
Posts: 1915
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:05 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 397 times
Been thanked: 699 times

Re: Fans next game

Unread post by mountaineerman » Thu Oct 01, 2020 7:52 pm

appbio91 wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:51 pm
PBR1893-BEER-HAT-GUY wrote:
Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:41 pm
Don’t think y’all will have to worry about that 7% number from what I’m hearing
Nailed it, when I saw this last night I assumed postponement was the word.
My youngest daughter and I went to Huntington to the game social distanced and their game plan was perfect. Empty row in front ,empty row to the back and 3 seats on either side . They executed it to a perfection . We never felt like we were in a problem.

Seattleapp
Posts: 1723
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:00 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 4482 times
Been thanked: 1270 times

Re: Fans next game

Unread post by Seattleapp » Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:56 pm

McLeansvilleAppFan wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 7:32 pm
clemmonsapp wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 5:44 pm


Perhaps the difference with outdoor events with over 10,000 normal capacity is the difficulty of maintaining adequate standards of distance at ingress, egress, restrooms, concessions and common areas.
I am willing to bet good money this is a very large part of it.

This is a multi-variable problem and some of it is plain guess-work I imagine. Not a blind, "throw a dart at a dartboard and see what comes up" type of guess, but something with some very squishy numbers that just are not exact. I doubt we have much data on putting people in a stadium and seeing how Covid spreads. A study like this would be full of ethic violations. Call it chaos theory. That is OK. Should it be 7% or 8% or 10%. That could be some guess work. I doubt it should be 30%.

Fire codes and such are run through an equation, I assume, that takes into account the number of seats and location and number of egress stations and some other variables. More than a few variables I would think and I bet in some of those variables we go with some gut hunches and consensus of the Fire Marshall community without a ton of hard data that says one thing or something different as to how much weight to give one variable or another.

This is no different at some level.
Speaking of Marshall, I was at that game and people seemed to be able to handle it pretty well up there. Social distancing while seated. Put your mask on when you go to the restroom. It’s not really that complicated. I’m by no means a COVID denier. I just see common sense. And yes I’ve had COVID and thankfully recovered.

ASU3432Mi
Posts: 1435
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 9:43 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 2551 times
Been thanked: 404 times

Re: Fans next game

Unread post by ASU3432Mi » Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:05 am

I was at the Marshall game as well. Lots of security guys making sure masks were worn and social distancing maintained. If Marshall can do it we sure as hell can do it.

Stonewall
Posts: 7094
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 3441 times
Been thanked: 4257 times

Re: Fans next game

Unread post by Stonewall » Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:37 am

mountaineerman wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 7:52 pm
appbio91 wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:51 pm
PBR1893-BEER-HAT-GUY wrote:
Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:41 pm
Don’t think y’all will have to worry about that 7% number from what I’m hearing
Nailed it, when I saw this last night I assumed postponement was the word.
My youngest daughter and I went to Huntington to the game social distanced and their game plan was perfect. Empty row in front ,empty row to the back and 3 seats on either side . They executed it to a perfection . We never felt like we were in a problem.
They executed.We didn't.

User avatar
WVAPPeer
Posts: 12426
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:14 am
School: Other
Location: Born: Almost Heaven
Has thanked: 4908 times
Been thanked: 2634 times

Re: Fans next game

Unread post by WVAPPeer » Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:46 am

I wasn't at Marshall so I don't know - kudos for doing a good job if nothing develops - however, I will add this - talking to an OLD childhood friend who is the hospital in a small community not too far from Huntington - he called yesterday to say they were going to try to move him to the hospital in Huntington - But they had no empty beds -
"Montani Semper Liberi"

The Dude Abides!!!

User avatar
McLeansvilleAppFan
Posts: 9528
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
Has thanked: 4473 times
Been thanked: 2235 times

Re: Fans next game

Unread post by McLeansvilleAppFan » Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:38 pm

Seattleapp wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:56 pm
McLeansvilleAppFan wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 7:32 pm
clemmonsapp wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 5:44 pm


Perhaps the difference with outdoor events with over 10,000 normal capacity is the difficulty of maintaining adequate standards of distance at ingress, egress, restrooms, concessions and common areas.
I am willing to bet good money this is a very large part of it.

This is a multi-variable problem and some of it is plain guess-work I imagine. Not a blind, "throw a dart at a dartboard and see what comes up" type of guess, but something with some very squishy numbers that just are not exact. I doubt we have much data on putting people in a stadium and seeing how Covid spreads. A study like this would be full of ethic violations. Call it chaos theory. That is OK. Should it be 7% or 8% or 10%. That could be some guess work. I doubt it should be 30%.

Fire codes and such are run through an equation, I assume, that takes into account the number of seats and location and number of egress stations and some other variables. More than a few variables I would think and I bet in some of those variables we go with some gut hunches and consensus of the Fire Marshall community without a ton of hard data that says one thing or something different as to how much weight to give one variable or another.

This is no different at some level.
Speaking of Marshall, I was at that game and people seemed to be able to handle it pretty well up there. Social distancing while seated. Put your mask on when you go to the restroom. It’s not really that complicated. I’m by no means a COVID denier. I just see common sense. And yes I’ve had COVID and thankfully recovered.
And your statement in not unreasonable. I am certainly not trying to defend the exact number of 7% and I would not be upset if it was a bit higher. I would also not be upset if it was set at 5% either.

Glad you recovered and I hope you don't have any future complications.
This is my very generic signature added to each post.

9Steelman
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 4:40 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 270 times

Re: Fans next game

Unread post by 9Steelman » Sat Oct 03, 2020 11:54 am

we were at Marshall also, good weekend, Marshall executed 12,000+ fans perfect. First time we have ever been. We were downtown near campus and stadium. Other than game great weekend.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”