House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
-
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:00 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3454 times
- Been thanked: 2028 times
House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
New bill in the House, not expected to prevail in the Senate, would be good news for many on here. Among other things, a prohibition against using student fees for athletics, antitrust exemption (probably partial), preemption of state law on NIL, and prohibition about student/athletes being employees (would kill any CBA ideas). Interesting to see what becomes of this.
https://www.espn.com/espn/story/_/id/45 ... l-payments
https://www.espn.com/espn/story/_/id/45 ... l-payments
-
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:48 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1025 times
- Been thanked: 1110 times
- Contact:
Re: House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
I'm not sure why athletes can't be employees..... I was an employee of the school as a student. I went to class as a student and worked at Legends as an employee.
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:24 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 248 times
Re: House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
I think making them employees opens the door to a player filing a lawsuit saying that he shouldn’t be required to attend class as a student, he would argue that the cafeteria workers aren’t required to be students, I’m just hired to play football so you can’t force me to be a student.
I’m no lawyer but I have no doubt that argument would be made, whether it would prevail is an interesting question.
If it did prevail, then college sports are truly over.
-
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:48 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1025 times
- Been thanked: 1110 times
- Contact:
Re: House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
Part of my hiring to work at Legends was contingent on going to school at App. They can say that they were hired only for football and take it to court but if the contact they sign stipulates they must be enrolled and maintain a certain GPA, then they can be terminated. It's no diff than any other job. People treat these athletes like that are some superior being that can do what they want. If I don't go to my mandatory training each year the Sheriff's Training and Standards are going to pull my certificate and I'm going to get canned by the sheriff. Schools just need to draw the line. If you want to come to school, get an education, and play some sports....so be it. If you are only interested in money then go elsewhere.KentHogan wrote: ↑Sat Jul 12, 2025 8:14 amI think making them employees opens the door to a player filing a lawsuit saying that he shouldn’t be required to attend class as a student, he would argue that the cafeteria workers aren’t required to be students, I’m just hired to play football so you can’t force me to be a student.
I’m no lawyer but I have no doubt that argument would be made, whether it would prevail is an interesting question.
If it did prevail, then college sports are truly over.
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:24 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 248 times
Re: House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
I agree with you and your argument is based in common sense. Unfortunately, the movement sweeping through college sports seems to be void of any common sense.ASUTodd wrote: ↑Sat Jul 12, 2025 9:40 amPart of my hiring to work at Legends was contingent on going to school at App. They can say that they were hired only for football and take it to court but if the contact they sign stipulates they must be enrolled and maintain a certain GPA, then they can be terminated. It's no diff than any other job. People treat these athletes like that are some superior being that can do what they want. If I don't go to my mandatory training each year the Sheriff's Training and Standards are going to pull my certificate and I'm going to get canned by the sheriff. Schools just need to draw the line. If you want to come to school, get an education, and play some sports....so be it. If you are only interested in money then go elsewhere.KentHogan wrote: ↑Sat Jul 12, 2025 8:14 amI think making them employees opens the door to a player filing a lawsuit saying that he shouldn’t be required to attend class as a student, he would argue that the cafeteria workers aren’t required to be students, I’m just hired to play football so you can’t force me to be a student.
I’m no lawyer but I have no doubt that argument would be made, whether it would prevail is an interesting question.
If it did prevail, then college sports are truly over.
Not that long ago kids getting scholarships were considered the lucky ones. Now, we’re suppose to believe they were victims and are owed back money.
I think all of this is tied to a bigger movement within our culture that embraces victimhood and it’s finally gotten its claws into college athletics.
Anyway, I hope for the best but it’s just a giant mess, and certainly doesn’t feel the same. The spirit of the game is dying quickly.
And I don’t actually think any of this is good for the kids in the long run.
-
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:44 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 486 times
Re: House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
Athletics should be considered a "work-study" program, like many other student employment opportunities on campus where you work in exchange for tuition breaks. I knew a girl when I at was school who worked afternoons in the Study Aboard Office, and, if I remember correctly, she had the choice to apply a substantial portion of her pay directly to tuition/room and board. I had an App wrestler once describe being an athlete like having a strict work-study, and I have always thought of athletics that same way since.ASUTodd wrote: ↑Sat Jul 12, 2025 9:40 amPart of my hiring to work at Legends was contingent on going to school at App. They can say that they were hired only for football and take it to court but if the contact they sign stipulates they must be enrolled and maintain a certain GPA, then they can be terminated. It's no diff than any other job. People treat these athletes like that are some superior being that can do what they want. If I don't go to my mandatory training each year the Sheriff's Training and Standards are going to pull my certificate and I'm going to get canned by the sheriff. Schools just need to draw the line. If you want to come to school, get an education, and play some sports....so be it. If you are only interested in money then go elsewhere.KentHogan wrote: ↑Sat Jul 12, 2025 8:14 amI think making them employees opens the door to a player filing a lawsuit saying that he shouldn’t be required to attend class as a student, he would argue that the cafeteria workers aren’t required to be students, I’m just hired to play football so you can’t force me to be a student.
I’m no lawyer but I have no doubt that argument would be made, whether it would prevail is an interesting question.
If it did prevail, then college sports are truly over.
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2022 11:20 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
Re: House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
Too late. It’s already over for many of us.KentHogan wrote: ↑Sat Jul 12, 2025 8:14 amI think making them employees opens the door to a player filing a lawsuit saying that he shouldn’t be required to attend class as a student, he would argue that the cafeteria workers aren’t required to be students, I’m just hired to play football so you can’t force me to be a student.
I’m no lawyer but I have no doubt that argument would be made, whether it would prevail is an interesting question.
If it did prevail, then college sports are truly over.
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2023 9:51 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1095 times
Re: House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
When is the last time the NCAA “cracked down” on a school or athletic program? Long time. The stuff schools and programs used to get in trouble for seem long gone. If a booster flat out hands a star football player an envelope of cash does anything even remotely happen?
Is the term student/athlete still used? I generally like to use the term one percenters when discussing certain topics. If you take the sum total of all college athletes at every level in reality how many legitimately are at highly paid level in terms of being must see? Right off the top eliminate virtually all D3,D2 and FCS football. Eliminate virtually all lower level basketball, baseball and Olympic sports. Now at the G5 level knock out probably 99%. To me all of this uncontrolled garbage is really for the sake of a precious few who exist every year, the small percent who will go on to get paid. Don’t you guys still think that a huge majority of college athletes still covet the traditional scholarship and free education?
Is the term student/athlete still used? I generally like to use the term one percenters when discussing certain topics. If you take the sum total of all college athletes at every level in reality how many legitimately are at highly paid level in terms of being must see? Right off the top eliminate virtually all D3,D2 and FCS football. Eliminate virtually all lower level basketball, baseball and Olympic sports. Now at the G5 level knock out probably 99%. To me all of this uncontrolled garbage is really for the sake of a precious few who exist every year, the small percent who will go on to get paid. Don’t you guys still think that a huge majority of college athletes still covet the traditional scholarship and free education?
-
- Posts: 4810
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1538 times
- Been thanked: 1736 times
Re: House of Reps bill on NCAA issues
Outside of football and basketball yes I do.Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 15, 2025 10:44 amWhen is the last time the NCAA “cracked down” on a school or athletic program? Long time. The stuff schools and programs used to get in trouble for seem long gone. If a booster flat out hands a star football player an envelope of cash does anything even remotely happen?
Is the term student/athlete still used? I generally like to use the term one percenters when discussing certain topics. If you take the sum total of all college athletes at every level in reality how many legitimately are at highly paid level in terms of being must see? Right off the top eliminate virtually all D3,D2 and FCS football. Eliminate virtually all lower level basketball, baseball and Olympic sports. Now at the G5 level knock out probably 99%. To me all of this uncontrolled garbage is really for the sake of a precious few who exist every year, the small percent who will go on to get paid. Don’t you guys still think that a huge majority of college athletes still covet the traditional scholarship and free education?