So Miss discussion

Seattleapp
Posts: 1791
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:00 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 4679 times
Been thanked: 1326 times

Re: So Miss discussion

Unread post by Seattleapp » Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:30 pm

BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:27 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:14 pm
yosef69 wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:52 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:49 pm
Stonewall wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:48 pm
We out gained them by almost a hundred yards. You can make an argument that the three turnovers were 28 points. It’s on the players. Poor execution, decision making , concentration? We were in a position to take control early and literally gave it away. What happened after Swann went down is another conversation.
Isn’t that coaching?
Dude get a grip. We can go around in circles on this. We all said it was all coaching last year so sure. Some of its coaching.

The difference is this is Loggains first year.
Again nothing personal but I didn’t know we got rid of Clark to break a dude in. I actually agree with the premise but I thought app
Didn’t settle for Mediocrity
Good grief dude. We out gained So.Miss by almost 100 yards. All 3 ints were in the red zone (so took scores off table for us)..The 2nd one (returned for a TD) was a weird play off the turf.
Yes, 5 has got to take care of the ball better, however, we basically dominated the 1st half except the scoreboard...which is key...I get it...
Once 11 came into the game, So. Miss. knew what we had...a true freshman at QB. They had 7 or 8 guys in the box... pressuring a QB that probably had zero reps with the first team offense during the week
Again. Thats two weeks in a row we were the “better” team but looked bad. I am behind App forever. But this is problematic. And it’s coaching 100%

BambooRdApp
Posts: 6133
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:32 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 2380 times
Been thanked: 4054 times

Re: So Miss discussion

Unread post by BambooRdApp » Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:47 pm

Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:30 pm
BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:27 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:14 pm
yosef69 wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:52 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:49 pm


Isn’t that coaching?
Dude get a grip. We can go around in circles on this. We all said it was all coaching last year so sure. Some of its coaching.

The difference is this is Loggains first year.
Again nothing personal but I didn’t know we got rid of Clark to break a dude in. I actually agree with the premise but I thought app
Didn’t settle for Mediocrity
Good grief dude. We out gained So.Miss by almost 100 yards. All 3 ints were in the red zone (so took scores off table for us)..The 2nd one (returned for a TD) was a weird play off the turf.
Yes, 5 has got to take care of the ball better, however, we basically dominated the 1st half except the scoreboard...which is key...I get it...
Once 11 came into the game, So. Miss. knew what we had...a true freshman at QB. They had 7 or 8 guys in the box... pressuring a QB that probably had zero reps with the first team offense during the week
Again. Thats two weeks in a row we were the “better” team but looked bad. I am behind App forever. But this is problematic. And it’s coaching 100%
Okay. Sure it is
Today I Give My All For Appalachian State!!
#FreeMillerHillForMoMoney!!

Seattleapp
Posts: 1791
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:00 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 4679 times
Been thanked: 1326 times

Re: So Miss discussion

Unread post by Seattleapp » Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:52 pm

BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:47 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:30 pm
BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:27 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:14 pm
yosef69 wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:52 pm


Dude get a grip. We can go around in circles on this. We all said it was all coaching last year so sure. Some of its coaching.

The difference is this is Loggains first year.
Again nothing personal but I didn’t know we got rid of Clark to break a dude in. I actually agree with the premise but I thought app
Didn’t settle for Mediocrity
Good grief dude. We out gained So.Miss by almost 100 yards. All 3 ints were in the red zone (so took scores off table for us)..The 2nd one (returned for a TD) was a weird play off the turf.
Yes, 5 has got to take care of the ball better, however, we basically dominated the 1st half except the scoreboard...which is key...I get it...
Once 11 came into the game, So. Miss. knew what we had...a true freshman at QB. They had 7 or 8 guys in the box... pressuring a QB that probably had zero reps with the first team offense during the week
Again. Thats two weeks in a row we were the “better” team but looked bad. I am behind App forever. But this is problematic. And it’s coaching 100%
Okay. Sure it is
What else is it?

ASUFan4863
Posts: 1115
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:57 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 506 times
Been thanked: 668 times

Re: So Miss discussion

Unread post by ASUFan4863 » Sat Sep 13, 2025 11:27 pm

Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:52 pm
BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:47 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:30 pm
BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:27 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:14 pm

Again nothing personal but I didn’t know we got rid of Clark to break a dude in. I actually agree with the premise but I thought app
Didn’t settle for Mediocrity
Good grief dude. We out gained So.Miss by almost 100 yards. All 3 ints were in the red zone (so took scores off table for us)..The 2nd one (returned for a TD) was a weird play off the turf.
Yes, 5 has got to take care of the ball better, however, we basically dominated the 1st half except the scoreboard...which is key...I get it...
Once 11 came into the game, So. Miss. knew what we had...a true freshman at QB. They had 7 or 8 guys in the box... pressuring a QB that probably had zero reps with the first team offense during the week
Again. Thats two weeks in a row we were the “better” team but looked bad. I am behind App forever. But this is problematic. And it’s coaching 100%
Okay. Sure it is
What else is it?
How bout just piss poor execution? The center dribbles the snap to Swann and then Swann just throws an ill advised pass to the defender. Neither one of those guys are coached to do that.

Swann makes the right read to Dubinon but makes a bad throw and the ball bounces right into the hands of a defender to go the other way.

Swann is being pressured (the real story of the night if you ask me) and floats a ball into double coverage for a pick.

None of those plays are because of coaching. It is a mixture of 85% bad execution and 15% bad luck.

Seattleapp
Posts: 1791
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:00 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 4679 times
Been thanked: 1326 times

Re: So Miss discussion

Unread post by Seattleapp » Sat Sep 13, 2025 11:31 pm

ASUFan4863 wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 11:27 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:52 pm
BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:47 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:30 pm
BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:27 pm

Good grief dude. We out gained So.Miss by almost 100 yards. All 3 ints were in the red zone (so took scores off table for us)..The 2nd one (returned for a TD) was a weird play off the turf.
Yes, 5 has got to take care of the ball better, however, we basically dominated the 1st half except the scoreboard...which is key...I get it...
Once 11 came into the game, So. Miss. knew what we had...a true freshman at QB. They had 7 or 8 guys in the box... pressuring a QB that probably had zero reps with the first team offense during the week
Again. Thats two weeks in a row we were the “better” team but looked bad. I am behind App forever. But this is problematic. And it’s coaching 100%
Okay. Sure it is
What else is it?
How bout just piss poor execution? The center dribbles the snap to Swann and then Swann just throws an ill advised pass to the defender. Neither one of those guys are coached to do that.

Swann makes the right read to Dubinon but makes a bad throw and the ball bounces right into the hands of a defender to go the other way.

Swann is being pressured (the real story of the night if you ask me) and floats a ball into double coverage for a pick.

None of those plays are because of coaching. It is a mixture of 85% bad execution and 15% bad luck.
Completely fair. Don’t disagree at all. Putting a true fresh in over his head when you may win with an experienced 5th year not acceptable. App needs to win now. This isn’t a minor league baseball team

ASUFan4863
Posts: 1115
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:57 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 506 times
Been thanked: 668 times

Re: So Miss discussion

Unread post by ASUFan4863 » Sat Sep 13, 2025 11:39 pm

Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 11:31 pm
ASUFan4863 wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 11:27 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:52 pm
BambooRdApp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:47 pm
Seattleapp wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:30 pm


Again. Thats two weeks in a row we were the “better” team but looked bad. I am behind App forever. But this is problematic. And it’s coaching 100%
Okay. Sure it is
What else is it?
How bout just piss poor execution? The center dribbles the snap to Swann and then Swann just throws an ill advised pass to the defender. Neither one of those guys are coached to do that.

Swann makes the right read to Dubinon but makes a bad throw and the ball bounces right into the hands of a defender to go the other way.

Swann is being pressured (the real story of the night if you ask me) and floats a ball into double coverage for a pick.

None of those plays are because of coaching. It is a mixture of 85% bad execution and 15% bad luck.
Completely fair. Don’t disagree at all. Putting a true fresh in over his head when you may win with an experienced 5th year not acceptable. App needs to win now. This isn’t a minor league baseball team
All summer the battle has been between Swann, Kohl and Gillon. Kohl was hurt so it just makes sense to go to Gillon if you actually believe in him as they do. Whether or not he should have pulled earlier is a valid question.

User avatar
Apptiger
Posts: 2210
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:16 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Lakeland, FL
Has thanked: 297 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: So Miss discussion

Unread post by Apptiger » Sun Sep 14, 2025 12:42 am

AppinVA wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:20 pm
Would’ve liked to see what Wiles could’ve done a little sooner, but I’m sure he’s not playing the first string defense.
This, he actually looked better than the other QBs to me. Granted it was late and probably not against their first team but his timing and accuracy seemed better.
Either way, they were much faster than us, played harder than us and wanted it more than us.

We have to stop beating ourselves.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”