http://www2.indystar.com/NCAA_financial ... hool_id=64
NCAA Revenue Matrix. Sheds light on where your favorite athletic program stands. I wish it would have included TV revenues. That would really be eye opening.

It says men's BBall makes more than Football in ticket sales. Either they're charging non-students $600 a ticket for BBall or it's totally wrong....Black Saturday wrote:For those bored souls waiting on football season:
http://www2.indystar.com/NCAA_financial ... hool_id=64
NCAA Revenue Matrix. Sheds light on where your favorite athletic program stands. I wish it would have included TV revenues. That would really be eye opening.
You need to look at it againGonzo wrote:It says men's BBall makes more than Football in ticket sales. Either they're charging non-students $600 a ticket for BBall or it's totally wrong....Black Saturday wrote:For those bored souls waiting on football season:
http://www2.indystar.com/NCAA_financial ... hool_id=64
NCAA Revenue Matrix. Sheds light on where your favorite athletic program stands. I wish it would have included TV revenues. That would really be eye opening.
Am I missing something?
I think you are looking at LouisvilleGonzo wrote:Ok just did....It says
Ticket Sales:
Men's Basketball-$7,422,864
Football-$5,291,501
Bingobcoach wrote:I think you are looking at LouisvilleGonzo wrote:Ok just did....It says
Ticket Sales:
Men's Basketball-$7,422,864
Football-$5,291,501
Just curious but where are you seeing that. I opened the link, selected App, and my figures show as follows:Gonzo wrote:Ok just did....It says
Ticket Sales:
Men's Basketball-$7,422,864
Football-$5,291,501
Well the football figure looks more like a per game numberGonzo wrote:Bingobcoach wrote:I think you are looking at LouisvilleGonzo wrote:Ok just did....It says
Ticket Sales:
Men's Basketball-$7,422,864
Football-$5,291,501![]()
The figures are definitely wrong though. A fraction of the real numbers.
The differences are in 2 spots. One is "institutional support," whatever that is. I guess it's exactly what it sounds like; that they can't cut the mustard without being subsidized by the school. However, I'm really surprised our "institutional support" was so low. It might even be creative accounting for student fees or merchandise and concessions that are owned by the school then put back into the program as a "gift" from the school. The other glaring difference is the sacrificial lamb line. Whereas we normally pay guarantees, with usually 1 yearly exception, to teams not demanding a home and home, they take every possible opportunity to leave Cullowhee.ASU-FTW wrote:These figures are bogus. Western Carolina apparently makes more money in football than Appalachian.
Does that compensate for a ~1,000:30,000 regular season average difference?AppAttack wrote:If they're talking about ticket sales $, then of course basketball would win out at most schools. At lesst 3X as many games.