Your points about what Healy does for the overall game plan are very valid. We will not have one guy next year who can do what Nate did. Baskin cannot be the 'stretch four' like Healy unless his 3-point shooting improves dramatically. However, I do think he can still draw his defender away from the basket because of his ability to start behind the arc and take his man off the dribble, which is a mismatch for most power forwards.Kgfish wrote:It's more complicated than just who you bring back. Have to look at how the ones you lost forced the opposition to play you. I agree Basking is a talented player but he is nowhere near the 3 point threat of Nate. Healy did so many things that drew attention and opened things up for other guys. The focus was on Donald so much it freed up Carter to make plays. Once Omar was the focus of opposing defenses the results spoke for themselves. Nate's 3 point shot had to be guarded and that brought a front court player away from the basket giving guys inside better rebound opportunities. Obacha has to learn to play within himself. He fouls way to much getting into your bench. Canty has shown a lot of skills but very little drive. We don't have a true point guard and I'd hate to depend on a freshmen to stabilize this team. Just my .02 worth but we'll see starting next December.asumike83 wrote:Maybe I'm putting too much stock into the strong play over the last 3 games but I tend to think we will be better next season. Healy is certainly a huge loss and Trice came on strong at the end of the season as well but compared to the last few years, the turnover is relatively light.Kgfish wrote: Have to disagree. We lose 30% of our scoring & 28% of our rebounds plus Healy's hustle plays that led to numerous turn overs and run out baskets. Sorry to say I didn't see anyone else on the floor lay it on the line like Nate did. Those are intangibles you can't put a figure on.
After 2012, we lost 55% of our scoring, which does not account for Rodey Milum, who left mid-season while putting up just over 8/game off the bench. We also lost 67% of our rebounding and 3 of our 5 starters. Even with all that turnover, I'd say we were a better team at the end of 2013 than we were at the end of 2012.
We will bring back 4 of our 5 starters and 6 of our regular 8-man rotation. The incoming class looks like it could be one of our best in recent years and if just 1 or 2 of those guys can contribute early and Jonathan Frye gets in the mix, I like our chances to get better.
Replacing Healy will be a tall task but I see it as one that can be done by committee. Tevin Baskin is a very talented player and I think he can pick up his scoring as a starter. Canty and Neal will also have to help pick up the scoring. As far as an energy guy, I really like Obacha to fill that role. I think Michael improved a lot throughout the year and plays with great hustle.
It is do or die for Capel in 2014. If nothing else, I think we finished a very inconsistent season with the best 3-game stretch we played all year. Hopefully, that momentum will carry over.
Replacing his consistent 3-point shooting will be a tall task but hopefully Frye and/or Aaron Scott can help out there, because they both come in with reputations as good spot-up shooters.
The playing time our first and second year guys got this season should pay dividends as well. We have a HUGE hole to fill with Healy leaving but we do return a core group of 6 guys who've spent a lot of time on the court together. Could be wishful thinking on my part but I am cautiously optimistic. Like you said, we'll find out this winter.