FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

User avatar
YesAppCan
Posts: 5879
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:52 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro
Has thanked: 1602 times
Been thanked: 568 times

FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by YesAppCan » Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:57 am


appswin1
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:58 am
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by appswin1 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 11:41 am

I don't post, but read a lot on this board. At one point I was on here a lot more on here but with the tablet issues its been a challenge. Hope that gets fixed soon.

Anyway...read this article on WSJ, and read the comment below it. I will reserve my judgment toward this person.

scatman77
Posts: 1299
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:38 am
Location: York, SC
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 993 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by scatman77 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:12 pm

appswin1 wrote:I don't post, but read a lot on this board. At one point I was on here a lot more on here but with the tablet issues its been a challenge. Hope that gets fixed soon.

Anyway...read this article on WSJ, and read the comment below it. I will reserve my judgment toward this person.
I too will reserve judgement towards that person as well. A lot of veteran posters here know that I was on the sidelines for the Brakefield years as a student athletic trainer. I've seen first hand the way the players and coaches react to wins and losses and bowl possibilities. We had the Tangerine Bowl in hand in 1975 if only WCU didn't cause us to stumble. So being in a FBS conference, playing better and more visible opponents, going to a bowl game.....I'm all for it. One question I'd like that person to answer: if he's so adamantly against the move and athletics, will he contribute his dollars to the general fund or with hold contributions because of the FBS move? If he with holds, a pox on him.
We don't slide at Appalachian State. It's a sign of weakness.

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8281
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 930 times
Been thanked: 3947 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by firemoose » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:42 pm

Simply put, there is no reason to comment on what they are putting out there since we've all heard it before. And there are a whole lot of things that will have to NOT happen for us to remain exactly where we are right now. But the one real questions is this. How many true, die hard App fans refer to us as "Appy"? Honestly I stopped reading right there. Didn't see a reason to go on after that.

appbanker
Posts: 454
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:26 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by appbanker » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:51 pm

Was the comment removed? I don't see any comments when I view the article.

appswin1
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:58 am
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by appswin1 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:52 pm

True on both of your statements. That person that posted is a hater and from the sounds of it a negative person. I don't do FB so I would have commented directly toward him at WSJ.

appchicago
Posts: 895
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:06 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 446 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by appchicago » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:52 pm

I saw that same poster opine on a previous article, but then their employer was listed as GNC (the vitamin place) and their alma mater was listed as (wait for it) Ohio University. Now they're a vet who went to Ohio State? I don't believe a word of it, and think it's just a troll rehashing tired arguments.

WataugaMan
Posts: 3972
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:17 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1408 times
Been thanked: 1083 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by WataugaMan » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:58 pm

appbanker wrote:Was the comment removed? I don't see any comments when I view the article.
Same here.

ASU84
Posts: 527
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:26 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Welcome, NC
Has thanked: 1451 times
Been thanked: 186 times
Contact:

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by ASU84 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 2:35 pm

WataugaMan wrote:
appbanker wrote:Was the comment removed? I don't see any comments when I view the article.
Same here.
No, the comments haven't been removed, I just read them. And like firemoose, I could not take them seriously when they said "Appy".

User avatar
JTApps1
Posts: 2720
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:18 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Belmont
Has thanked: 645 times
Been thanked: 1207 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by JTApps1 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 4:27 pm

firemoose wrote:Simply put, there is no reason to comment on what they are putting out there since we've all heard it before. And there are a whole lot of things that will have to NOT happen for us to remain exactly where we are right now. But the one real questions is this. How many true, die hard App fans refer to us as "Appy"? Honestly I stopped reading right there. Didn't see a reason to go on after that.
Same here. Once i read Appy I knew this person's complaints weren't worth reading. Luckily someone put a favorable response up.

App74
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 5:05 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 431 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by App74 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:54 pm

JTApps1 wrote:
firemoose wrote:Simply put, there is no reason to comment on what they are putting out there since we've all heard it before. And there are a whole lot of things that will have to NOT happen for us to remain exactly where we are right now. But the one real questions is this. How many true, die hard App fans refer to us as "Appy"? Honestly I stopped reading right there. Didn't see a reason to go on after that.
Same here. Once i read Appy I knew this person's complaints weren't worth reading. Luckily someone put a favorable response up.
Says Appy, probably says Appalayshun. Best thing for you Hickory Apps to do is to take your dog or cat somewhere else.

Saint3333
Posts: 14490
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
Has thanked: 4059 times
Been thanked: 6286 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by Saint3333 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 7:48 pm

I disagree with the article. The decision was validated well before now ;-)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

AppOrange
Posts: 1434
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 7:28 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Raleigh
Has thanked: 1062 times
Been thanked: 717 times
Contact:

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by AppOrange » Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:55 pm

My bet is a WCU fan
1996

User avatar
ASU-FTW
Posts: 998
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:31 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 196 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by ASU-FTW » Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:49 pm

AppOrange wrote:My bet is a WCU fan
Yep. Probably mad that we left them with the likes of Mercer, VMI, ETSU, Sammy, etc.

huskie3
Posts: 4600
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2000 9:57 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Gaston County
Has thanked: 689 times
Been thanked: 657 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by huskie3 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:21 pm

AppOrange wrote:My bet is a WCU fan
No, not ccc, there were complete sentences.
Bring Your A Game!

Cincy App
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:38 pm
Has thanked: 181 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by Cincy App » Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:34 pm

appbanker wrote:Was the comment removed? I don't see any comments when I view the article.
The article has 2 tabs under the Satterfield heading - story and comments. Click on the "comments" tab for the responses.

appbanker
Posts: 454
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:26 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by appbanker » Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:38 pm

I wonder if the ad blocker stops the comments. If I pull up the article on my iPhone I can see comments.

1ASU78
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:51 pm
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 260 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by 1ASU78 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 11:29 pm

Well I'm not going to let this guy stick his arm up my horse's a** we would never be to tell them apart.

MtnMan09
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:44 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 181 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by MtnMan09 » Wed Dec 16, 2015 9:16 am

Replying to everyone's comment too. This guys must be a quality troll because he's getting under my skin when most usually don't. I think, like others, it must be because he keeps referring to App as his school but by using the Appy moniker.

My Dad used to always tell me to disregard anyone who presents opinion as cold hard fact. This guy does that in droves.

"FCS tournament provided better competition and excitement."

"Southern Conf schools are subtantially far superior" -Not too superior though. His alleged attendance at one didn't help in the spelling department. (I kid, I always hate the spell check Nazis, but he deserves it)

"Playoffs were much more meaningful and fun."

Which he coupled with contradictory and circular statements to boot:

"And on the field, the previous AD called the Sun Belt a glorified FCS conference."- an AD who then took a job in the same conference....

"BTW, did you enjoy the FCS games on ESPN and ESPN2 last week? Did you enjoy the FCS years when we were on ESPN multiple times during the playoffs?"-You know what I did enjoy that...But I've enjoyed being able to watch EVERY game this year on TV that I couldn't make it too. But in his defense I guess his whole argument is "less is more."

" I guess all that FBS bottom dwelling doesn't help academics afterall."- How does one conflate athletic prowess with a school's academic ranking? Has anyone ever suggested that an FBS move would launch App into the public ivies? Also regardless of whether we stayed FCS or not we will never be Richmond, Davidson, Georgetown, or... YALE? Is he serious?

"A lot of programs, at least the smart ones, have dropped down divisions to not play the irresponsible 'keeping up with the jone's' game in athletics"- Please name one FBS school that has dropped down a division. I make this statement without any research, but I feel confident that you cannot answer this.

So he accomplished his mission and got under my skin and the lawyer in me required that I address his absurdity. I apologize for the rant.

User avatar
Capt. Ed
Posts: 372
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:43 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 429 times
Been thanked: 216 times

Re: FBS move validated by bowl game---WSJ

Unread post by Capt. Ed » Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:16 am

Saint3333 wrote:I disagree with the article. The decision was validated well before now ;-)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Enthusiastically agree. I've always been in favor of move up. My three App buddies were moaning about the change. Full of doomsday talk about attendance and the program.

All that changed with the incredible finish to the 2014 Season. Now it's who do we play next and I can't wait till next year's Miami and Tennessee game.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”