I am not saying what you are hearing or seeing is wrong but just take notice that for some around our program they have an agenda to put up down and hope he fails because he has not been the butt kisser that some want. It also does not mean they are wrong but just something to keep in mind. I take it with a grain of salt for now.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 07, 2026 9:13 pmI’m not interested in being right nor am I interested in saying I told you so if I’m right. I’ve provided my rationale for my opinion. I’ve been around long enough and interviewed enough people to identify character. His body language and sound bites were concerning from the get go. I’ve talked to enough people with different insights to the program that it’s pretty evident that he is not fostering a culture for success. As much as folks want to believe, these decisions aren’t made solely on records. Clark wasn’t fired for his on field performance and DLo’s fate won’t be sealed by the same. There are way more factors to these decisions that occur between Sunday and Friday than people realize. Like I said, if the money has been secured, that tells you all you need to know the mood on Jack Branch.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 07, 2026 8:26 pmI would normally agree but that is no guarantee. The same thing happened with Clark a year before we let him go and many others, you included, were still defending that you did not think we would let him go. Even when I told you the day before it was official that I was hearing he was gone you still did not think it would happen. Not trashing on you but you never know. Loggains obviously knows this and these are the moves he is making. We just have to wait and see. I have never fully said my opinion on him other than I am being open minded and giving him a chance. I feel like those who were against or for him right off the bat without letting things play out usually just want to be able to say "I told you so". I gave Clark 4 years before I said for certain we need to move on and I feel like I would be unfair to not give Loggains at least 2 years, preferably 3 years, before making that determination. This is definitely a "prove it" year for Loggains after the failure to improve the record though.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 07, 2026 6:23 pmIt is my understanding that the money to payout the contract has been secured if needed. And if that isn’t a telling sign about the program under DLo then I don’t know what to tell them.Lowcountry App wrote: ↑Sat Feb 07, 2026 11:18 amI assume then the $1,350,000 buyout at the end of this year is not an issue.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 07, 2026 10:46 am
And if he does not and we miss a bowl game then he will be out at the end of the year if what I'm hearing from people connected to BOT and Gillin is true. It is all on him and I'm sure he knows it. It will be interesting to see what he does and what the results will be.
I think most know your point about records. If record is good enough it can overcome anything outside of a major legal issue though. For example, the record was final straw with James Franklin but those couple of early losses were not the reason they wanted him gone. They had many others reasons but that was just the first chance they had with struggles on the field and used it as an excuse.
There was money committed to get rid of Clark in 2023 and they were ready to make a change if he had a couple more losses. I don't know either way if money is in hand or committed but I would not be shocked if some booster who never wanted him and does not like that they are not getting their butt kiss has committed it.
I will say that if we do make a change I think we need to go for a D2 or FCS head coach who has shown they can find under the radar talent and know how to win and manage the portal and HS recruiting well instead of another P4 coordinator.