Agree. This statement is 100% true. As a statistics geek, I mentioned it because I am curious what their metrics are to determine this.
Clemson game thread and discussion
-
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 6933 times
- Been thanked: 4404 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
-
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:01 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 540 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I saw an offensive set Saturday that had a wideout on each side and two running backs in the backfield and looked like two tight ends. That looked like a play with tons of possibilities.
Looked something like this:
---------------------------x---x---------------------------------------------
-----------------------------x-----------------------------------------------
x------------------------xxxxxx-----------------x--------------------------
If the backs can catch, this would be a ton of options for Joey at the line of scrimmage.
Looked something like this:
---------------------------x---x---------------------------------------------
-----------------------------x-----------------------------------------------
x------------------------xxxxxx-----------------x--------------------------
If the backs can catch, this would be a ton of options for Joey at the line of scrimmage.
-
- Posts: 5992
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 653 times
- Been thanked: 1541 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
100%. Their FPI is a complete waste of time to read.
-
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 6933 times
- Been thanked: 4404 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I missed that 3 back set? Where in the game was it? I’d like to go back and check it out?
Was it 3 backs or a 2 back set with the TE? I seem to recall a set with Hamlett at H-back.
-
- Posts: 5992
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 653 times
- Been thanked: 1541 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I think this game is going to be very similar to the A&M game. I do think the Clemson QB is better than the A&M QB and believe they will be a better team but I think we are better, like you said. This will be an interesting matchup. I would also be more surprised if Clemson covers the spread than if we win. I am expecting it to be within 10.MrCraig wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 9:50 amFun Fact: Texas A&M was a 17.5 pt favorite over App in 2022. I think this game has a lot of similarities, except I think App is better now than they were in 2022. I would be more surprised at Clemson covering the spread than App winning outright. Clemson has a very good defensive line and... that's about it.
-
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:53 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: High Point
- Has thanked: 1548 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Go to the 6:10 left in the 1st quarter. Kanye starts in slot, comes into the backfield with Haywood & Castle. Haywood takes to about the 4 yard line
-
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 10:34 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1739 times
- Been thanked: 1185 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Boston College killed FSU last night with 2 plays.
1. TE clears the seam/safety and semi picks the LB guarding the RB. WR takes the corner deep opening a void in the flat. RB Wheel Route they hit about 3-4 times and dropped another.
2. Qb RPO- H back in motion behind line, fakes the handoff to RB and rolls hard to the right either hitting the motion H back in the flat or tucking it up field for 20 yards. We do this alot but it looked so good with their fast QB.
Loved both those plays and FSU could not stop it.
1. TE clears the seam/safety and semi picks the LB guarding the RB. WR takes the corner deep opening a void in the flat. RB Wheel Route they hit about 3-4 times and dropped another.
2. Qb RPO- H back in motion behind line, fakes the handoff to RB and rolls hard to the right either hitting the motion H back in the flat or tucking it up field for 20 yards. We do this alot but it looked so good with their fast QB.
Loved both those plays and FSU could not stop it.
-
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 6933 times
- Been thanked: 4404 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
FSU couldn’t stop anything. I hear the faucets in the locker room are still running as well.311neers wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 10:10 amBoston College killed FSU last night with 2 plays.
1. TE clears the seam/safety and semi picks the LB guarding the RB. WR takes the corner deep opening a void in the flat. RB Wheel Route they hit about 3-4 times and dropped another.
2. Qb RPO- H back in motion behind line, fakes the handoff to RB and rolls hard to the right either hitting the motion H back in the flat or tucking it up field for 20 yards. We do this alot but it looked so good with their fast QB.
Loved both those plays and FSU could not stop it.
-
- Posts: 13370
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
- Has thanked: 3268 times
- Been thanked: 5056 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Am I the only one that would be ok if we never ran the WR screen with three WRs to one side when we can see the DBs are pressing up?
-
- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 6:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 283 times
- Been thanked: 1158 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
SP+ is my personal favorite model and has the spread at +9.7. Feels wayyyyy more reasonable than 17. That’s a lot of points.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 9:58 am100%. Their FPI is a complete waste of time to read.
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:24 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
My thoughts:
First, we have to survive the first quarter, Clemson will try to make a statement early. Make no mistake, they will be desperate to win this game.
Then we will have to have a throw first mentality in my opinion. Going to be tough to run at Clemson without first having some success in the air.
Defensively, I think we need to sell out a bit against the run and trust our secondary to hold up. On third downs, send pressure! No 3 man rushes, make their QB beat us.
But what do I know!
First, we have to survive the first quarter, Clemson will try to make a statement early. Make no mistake, they will be desperate to win this game.
Then we will have to have a throw first mentality in my opinion. Going to be tough to run at Clemson without first having some success in the air.
Defensively, I think we need to sell out a bit against the run and trust our secondary to hold up. On third downs, send pressure! No 3 man rushes, make their QB beat us.
But what do I know!
-
- Posts: 1320
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:27 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 950 times
- Been thanked: 1049 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this basically just the wishbone formation out of the pistol? I think it's awesome, and if that's how it is used it adds a lot of wrinkles to the offense.spacemonkey wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 9:57 amI saw an offensive set Saturday that had a wideout on each side and two running backs in the backfield and looked like two tight ends. That looked like a play with tons of possibilities.
Looked something like this:
---------------------------x---x---------------------------------------------
-----------------------------x-----------------------------------------------
x------------------------xxxxxx-----------------x--------------------------
If the backs can catch, this would be a ton of options for Joey at the line of scrimmage.
-
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 6933 times
- Been thanked: 4404 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I agree with most of this. I think that Clemson will try and refocus on doing what they normally do. We can apply pressure by utilizing the clock to minimize their opportunities to get rolling offensively. I don’t expect us to be able to move the ball consistently, but if we can move it about 20 yards per possession and flip the field each time. Make them move the length of the field to score. If we do that enough, it will make their fans restless and create some panic.KentHogan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 11:45 amMy thoughts:
First, we have to survive the first quarter, Clemson will try to make a statement early. Make no mistake, they will be desperate to win this game.
Then we will have to have a throw first mentality in my opinion. Going to be tough to run at Clemson without first having some success in the air.
Defensively, I think we need to sell out a bit against the run and trust our secondary to hold up. On third downs, send pressure! No 3 man rushes, make their QB beat us.
But what do I know!
-
- Posts: 5992
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 653 times
- Been thanked: 1541 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Agreed. Their QB is not good at all on deep throws so if we can hold Mafah in check and just disrupt their QB we could cause them a lot of trouble. It would be great for Joey to hit a couple deep passes early so Clemson can't stack the box. I feel like we could use the pass to open up the run early. It will be interesting to see our team strategy going in.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:14 pmI agree with most of this. I think that Clemson will try and refocus on doing what they normally do. We can apply pressure by utilizing the clock to minimize their opportunities to get rolling offensively. I don’t expect us to be able to move the ball consistently, but if we can move it about 20 yards per possession and flip the field each time. Make them move the length of the field to score. If we do that enough, it will make their fans restless and create some panic.KentHogan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 11:45 amMy thoughts:
First, we have to survive the first quarter, Clemson will try to make a statement early. Make no mistake, they will be desperate to win this game.
Then we will have to have a throw first mentality in my opinion. Going to be tough to run at Clemson without first having some success in the air.
Defensively, I think we need to sell out a bit against the run and trust our secondary to hold up. On third downs, send pressure! No 3 man rushes, make their QB beat us.
But what do I know!
I listened to Swinney's press conference and he said good stuff about us but a lot of it was him rambling on to defend his QB and about their culture and how they view this opportunity to play at home. I have talked to several Clemson folks who think Dabo is full of it and they think we have a real shot to win. I just hope that their team overlooks us some. It would be huge for us to go in there and get a win.
-
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 10:34 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1739 times
- Been thanked: 1185 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
ACC highest ranked team is 15th right now- Miami.311neers wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 9:23 pmJust looking at last year and SEC had 6 in the top 12 (but 1 of those was Texas). They’ll beat up on each other for sure. I’m not sure what ACC teams are going to go 10-2 when Clemson FSU VT all have 1 loss already. Miami or Clemson feels like the ACC team to beat. Clemson schedule is charmin the rest of the way, after us, of course.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 9:14 pmI am curious to see how teams beat up on each other. If the ACC or Big 12 runner-up is 10-3 and the 4th team from SEC is 9-3 or 8-4 I bet the ACC would get the 2nd team. There is no doubt that the SEC and Big Ten are both hoping to get 4 each. It will be easier to really debate this come early November once things have started to play out.Black Saturday wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:49 pmYou hit the nail on the head, by design it's an SEC and B1G show, everyone is likely 1 and done311neers wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:38 pmSEC might get more than 3 in.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:16 pm
Style points will absolutely matter and I hope Shawn realizes that. The reality is with this current system you hurt yourself by holding back and not trying to make a statement.
Just doing the math on the picks for playoff I would imagine 3 from SEC and Big Ten each, 2 from Big 12 and ACC each, and highest rated G5 champ. That is 11 spots. If a second G5 team is going to get in or you want to guarantee you are highest rated I think style points will matter big time.
Georgia Bama Texas OU Ole Miss Mizzou and Tennessee all have a solid chance. ACC only getting 1 in at this rate. Edit: Forgot LSU. Sheesh, that’s 8 teams that can run with anyone. Might be time to go to 16 already! Haha
SEC has 7 teams ranked higher. 7 in the top 13. They'll beat each other up, and are probably a little overinflated right now but the auto bye top 4 seed is a bad decision by the committee. It'll change but as we sit here today, that 3 seed would go to a 15th overall Miami...
And if we sneak in at 12th seed and Miami has a 3 seed with a bye for winning a hot dog water conference just doesn't sit right.
-
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 6933 times
- Been thanked: 4404 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Miami is a good football team. Keep in mind that the G5 champ isn’t guaranteed the 12th spot. The byes go to the top 4 ranked conference champs. It’s conceivable that if either Memphis, Boise or an App run the table then they could get ranked higher than a 2-3 loss ACC or Big 12 Champ. Not likely, but Heather Dinich did mention this scenario on one of the ESPN shows yesterday.311neers wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:51 pmACC highest ranked team is 15th right now- Miami.311neers wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 9:23 pmJust looking at last year and SEC had 6 in the top 12 (but 1 of those was Texas). They’ll beat up on each other for sure. I’m not sure what ACC teams are going to go 10-2 when Clemson FSU VT all have 1 loss already. Miami or Clemson feels like the ACC team to beat. Clemson schedule is charmin the rest of the way, after us, of course.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 9:14 pmI am curious to see how teams beat up on each other. If the ACC or Big 12 runner-up is 10-3 and the 4th team from SEC is 9-3 or 8-4 I bet the ACC would get the 2nd team. There is no doubt that the SEC and Big Ten are both hoping to get 4 each. It will be easier to really debate this come early November once things have started to play out.Black Saturday wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:49 pmYou hit the nail on the head, by design it's an SEC and B1G show, everyone is likely 1 and done
SEC has 7 teams ranked higher. 7 in the top 13. They'll beat each other up, and are probably a little overinflated right now but the auto bye top 4 seed is a bad decision by the committee. It'll change but as we sit here today, that 3 seed would go to a 15th overall Miami...
And if we sneak in at 12th seed and Miami has a 3 seed with a bye for winning a hot dog water conference just doesn't sit right.
-
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2023 9:51 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 800 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I always go back to why on earth do people get hung up on preseason rankings and for that matter the rankings after ONE game is played. The 12 teams are not picked today. We all know and need to accept that probably 4 SEC teams will get in. Lots and lots of stuff will happen over the next 3 months. There will almost certainly be some 8-4 team get in who will create a firestorm of controversy but the committee will justify them getting an at large spot. If we run the table and have wins over a 10-2 Clemson and a 10-2 Liberty and for that matter a 9-3 ECU we have a right to squawk about a 12 seed but let the season play out.
-
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 6933 times
- Been thanked: 4404 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I’m skeptical that our OL can give Joey enough time in a clean pocket to get a downfield throw off. I don’t put a lot of stock in fan opinions. They don’t know what Dabo knows about his team. Most of those opinions and attitudes are formed out of frustration from not seeing what they want to see. Dabo can afford to be Dabo because Clemson can’t afford to get rid of him. They also want him to dip in the portal and he won’t. NIL creates a lot of “rat poison” from those wanting their employees on the field. See Florida. The Bull Gators are some of the worst donors in the game.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:40 pmAgreed. Their QB is not good at all on deep throws so if we can hold Mafah in check and just disrupt their QB we could cause them a lot of trouble. It would be great for Joey to hit a couple deep passes early so Clemson can't stack the box. I feel like we could use the pass to open up the run early. It will be interesting to see our team strategy going in.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:14 pmI agree with most of this. I think that Clemson will try and refocus on doing what they normally do. We can apply pressure by utilizing the clock to minimize their opportunities to get rolling offensively. I don’t expect us to be able to move the ball consistently, but if we can move it about 20 yards per possession and flip the field each time. Make them move the length of the field to score. If we do that enough, it will make their fans restless and create some panic.KentHogan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 11:45 amMy thoughts:
First, we have to survive the first quarter, Clemson will try to make a statement early. Make no mistake, they will be desperate to win this game.
Then we will have to have a throw first mentality in my opinion. Going to be tough to run at Clemson without first having some success in the air.
Defensively, I think we need to sell out a bit against the run and trust our secondary to hold up. On third downs, send pressure! No 3 man rushes, make their QB beat us.
But what do I know!
I listened to Swinney's press conference and he said good stuff about us but a lot of it was him rambling on to defend his QB and about their culture and how they view this opportunity to play at home. I have talked to several Clemson folks who think Dabo is full of it and they think we have a real shot to win. I just hope that their team overlooks us some. It would be huge for us to go in there and get a win.
-
- Posts: 5992
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 653 times
- Been thanked: 1541 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Rankings are really pointless until the CFP and comes out that ranking is all that really matters. It is great to be listed and we should want to be doing well enough that we are at least receiving votes for marketing but as you said it is so early now. There will be so much happen over the next 2-3 months that will make some of the debates people had over the summer and now look really dumb to even consider. We had people who had FSU as a potential top 8 seed and now they aren't even receiving votes. A lot more crazy will happen between now and late November.Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 1:15 pmI always go back to why on earth do people get hung up on preseason rankings and for that matter the rankings after ONE game is played. The 12 teams are not picked today. We all know and need to accept that probably 4 SEC teams will get in. Lots and lots of stuff will happen over the next 3 months. There will almost certainly be some 8-4 team get in who will create a firestorm of controversy but the committee will justify them getting an at large spot. If we run the table and have wins over a 10-2 Clemson and a 10-2 Liberty and for that matter a 9-3 ECU we have a right to squawk about a 12 seed but let the season play out.
- moonshine
- Posts: 2156
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:25 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: High Country
- Has thanked: 283 times
- Been thanked: 741 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
This formation example is more of a pro set (split back) than a wishbone. Based on Monkey's initial thought with 2 WR, 2 RB and 2 TE, the offense would have only had 4 OL. The wishbone formation has a FB lined up behind the QB with 2 HB offset behind the FB. Not to be confused with the flexbone which has a FB lined up behind the QB and 2 slot backs lined up in the backfield just outside each T.
Hopefully the D can stay disciplined and fill their gaps to try and control the Clemson run game. The little bit of the UGA game that I did see, it appeared they were trying to get the ball out of Klubnik's hands quickly to nullify the Dawg's pass rush who ended up with 2 sacks and 6 TFLs. Hopefully they won't be as worried about App's pass rush and will try to run some longer developing routes that will give our D a chance to apply pressure and move CK off his spot. The secondary needs to be cognizant of where #0 Williams is on the field. He had 33% of the receptions, 54% of the receiving yards and the only play the Tigers had over 20 yards. Their TE, #9 Briningstool, is a big target who could pose matchup problems, especially in the redzone. The key is keeping Mafah in check and then forcing CK to make uncomfortable throws.
Picked up via free agency by the High Country All-Stars