Wyoming Discussion

User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 7612
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1444 times
Been thanked: 1775 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by biggie » Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:12 pm

Another week of not knowing what QB we will face.


User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 7612
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1444 times
Been thanked: 1775 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by biggie » Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:13 pm

Just realized earlier this game will be on CBSSN, now I have to try to find that, think it might be on Paramount + but not seeing it when I scroll through their live TV channels.

User avatar
YesAppCan
Posts: 5874
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:52 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro
Has thanked: 1585 times
Been thanked: 567 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by YesAppCan » Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:32 pm

As to the “acclimation” stuff… Boone is 3333, ECU is 64’. They had no problem adjusting to Boone. Our guys are used to Boone and should have no problems adjusting to Laramie.

User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 7612
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1444 times
Been thanked: 1775 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by biggie » Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:40 pm

YesAppCan wrote:
Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:32 pm
As to the “acclimation” stuff… Boone is 3333, ECU is 64’. They had no problem adjusting to Boone. Our guys are used to Boone and should have no problems adjusting to Laramie.
If you haven't been, it is different. ECU to Boone is a difference, but pretty easy to adjust especially for athletes I assume. From Boone to 7,200 feet is a much bigger difference. Hopefully being in great shape the team will adjust better than most regular people that do it.

User avatar
ArmantiWaterSafety
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 11:31 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Hickory, NC
Has thanked: 306 times
Been thanked: 501 times
Contact:

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by ArmantiWaterSafety » Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:53 pm

SCIENCE

Relative to air pressure, technically it's 20.9% at all elevations, but it feels different because it's not as available to the body.

20.9% oxygen at at sea level
18.6% oxygen at 3000'

18.6% oxygen at 3000'
16.0% oxygen at 7000'

appgrad95&97
Posts: 1151
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 1:07 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 431 times
Been thanked: 533 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by appgrad95&97 » Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:50 pm

Nate can't get 25 carries up there. If blocking is the problem with the other running backs, we might have a problem.

User avatar
AppStateNews
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:36 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 220 times
Been thanked: 2289 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by AppStateNews » Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:55 pm

Our sports nutritionist actually went to Laramie this spring to do a study for the elevation (along with other high elevation destinations in the US). I didn't know if that was public information as it was the first of it's kind, but Clark alluded to it in his presser.

If the study was successful/accurate, our players will be perfectly fine.
tAPPedInSports.net

Not affiliated with the above website

User avatar
AtlAppMan
Posts: 2069
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: ATL
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 1301 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by AtlAppMan » Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:56 pm

appgrad95&97 wrote:
Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:50 pm
Nate can't get 25 carries up there. If blocking is the problem with the other running backs, we might have a problem.
Nate had an extra 20% available against ECU so he should be fine.

Yosefus
Posts: 1779
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 11:50 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 285 times
Been thanked: 665 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by Yosefus » Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:00 pm

It definitely sounds like if we do lose this game it will either be due to the Elevation or the Weather.
I hope our boys and coaches are hard at it on preparation. Won't be an easy game. Aught to win if they play App football. Bohls guys won't make many mistakes.

GSUwasGump’sFallbackSchool
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2021 7:16 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 454 times
Been thanked: 206 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by GSUwasGump’sFallbackSchool » Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:01 pm

AtlAppMan wrote:
Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:56 pm
appgrad95&97 wrote:
Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:50 pm
Nate can't get 25 carries up there. If blocking is the problem with the other running backs, we might have a problem.
Nate had an extra 20% available against ECU so he should be fine.
Leading rusher for the entire country. He looks remarkable right now. I have a feeling he’s got a highlight move stored in the chamber for every game.

User avatar
NattyBumppo'sRevenge
Posts: 3269
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:55 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Charlotte, NC
Has thanked: 1764 times
Been thanked: 1810 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by NattyBumppo'sRevenge » Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:51 pm

GSUwasGump’sFallbackSchool wrote:
Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:01 pm
AtlAppMan wrote:
Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:56 pm
appgrad95&97 wrote:
Mon Sep 18, 2023 4:50 pm
Nate can't get 25 carries up there. If blocking is the problem with the other running backs, we might have a problem.
Nate had an extra 20% available against ECU so he should be fine.
Leading rusher for the entire country. He looks remarkable right now. I have a feeling he’s got a highlight move stored in the chamber for every game.
Like you said, Nate is the lead rusher in the nation. If he wants to carry it 25 times, let him carry it 25 times.

User avatar
app_gorilla
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:46 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by app_gorilla » Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:41 pm

Yosefus wrote:
Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:00 pm
It definitely sounds like if we do lose this game it will either be due to the Elevation or the Weather.
I hope our boys and coaches are hard at it on preparation. Won't be an easy game. Aught to win if they play App football. Bohls guys won't make many mistakes.
The Pokes are favored, and from what I've seen of them this year plus the significant home advantage of the War, I think they should be.

This is an extremely good team that's playing with some mojo this year so far. P5-level front seven. Great running game.

I really hope the team is preparing for a war (no pun intended), because they're going to get one.

User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 7612
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1444 times
Been thanked: 1775 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by biggie » Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:00 pm

Just heard a podcast for Wyoming say they don’t expect their QB Peasley to play. He seems like more of a passing threat than the QB Svoboda who only threw for 136 and 1 INT vs TX. He doesn’t seem like a running threat with 5 rushes for -13 yds with 1 sack.

Peasley was the leading rusher vs TT.

Would seem we may be able to focus on the run primarily. Especially if that wind forecasts is true.

User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 7612
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1444 times
Been thanked: 1775 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by biggie » Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:32 pm


AppSt94
Posts: 10129
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Huntersville, NC
Has thanked: 6683 times
Been thanked: 4208 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by AppSt94 » Tue Sep 19, 2023 5:13 am

Coach Bohl

User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 7612
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1444 times
Been thanked: 1775 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by biggie » Tue Sep 19, 2023 7:24 am


Bigdaddyg1
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2023 9:51 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 756 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by Bigdaddyg1 » Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:17 am

Isn't their QB uncertainty and depth a big deal? If we don't overpursue on plays and remain disciplined our defense is pretty damn tough.

ASUFan4863
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:57 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 352 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by ASUFan4863 » Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:30 am

I feel really confident about this game for some reason. I believe the team is just coming together and becoming a typical App State team. As far as I am concerned, the OL has played excellent the past two weeks and that is where it all starts for us.

AppSt94
Posts: 10129
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Huntersville, NC
Has thanked: 6683 times
Been thanked: 4208 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by AppSt94 » Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:41 am

Wyoming will present some unique challenges for us. They are a good litmus test for how we match up with JMU.

spacemonkey
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:01 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Wyoming Discussion

Unread post by spacemonkey » Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:49 am

It is a long season and I like our chances in all of the games left on the calendar (IF WE STAY HEALTHY). We have a TOUGH schedule because the Sunbelt is for real. We need to start the write in campaign to AP voters for top 25 recognition if we beat Wyoming and if UNC keeps winning. Overtime game at UNC means we are as good as UNC. When UNC gets to 10-12 we should at least be in the top 25 and it would be easy for AP writers to justify ranking us top 25 (with the UNC overtime) if we continue to win.

Locked Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”