We are in need of someone to take over the maintenance of the MMB. Yosef has done it for a long time, and we are grateful for all he has done, but life happens and he no longer has the time to devote to its upkeep. If anyone here is interested in helping to keep the board running, please let me know via DM.

Frank Ponce

appgrad2010
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 11:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by appgrad2010 » Fri Dec 10, 2021 1:52 pm

Who actually posts on here who is a coach at any level? If not, it clearly shows as majority on here are so clueless.

fjblair
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:03 pm
Has thanked: 1374 times
Been thanked: 525 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by fjblair » Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:02 pm

ASU3432Mi wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 12:20 pm
Did we ever run a screen? Also needed to utilize Tight Ends more and pass some to RBs out of backfield.
No screens, no wheels, not much with TE.

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:55 pm

We went 10-2 in the regular season so I won’t absolutely pile on negativity but I am curious. I noticed that on more than one occasion when we ran a play action pass Chase faked a handoff to the wrong side. The back went one way and he simply did the fake. Never coached a football game in my life and never played a down but those plays looked messed up.

User avatar
AppStateNews
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:36 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 220 times
Been thanked: 2289 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by AppStateNews » Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pm

bigdaddyg wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:55 pm
We went 10-2 in the regular season so I won’t absolutely pile on negativity but I am curious. I noticed that on more than one occasion when we ran a play action pass Chase faked a handoff to the wrong side. The back went one way and he simply did the fake. Never coached a football game in my life and never played a down but those plays looked messed up.
Majority of the time it was because the line was slanted one way and RB had a pass protection assignment. The play as it's drawn up is for the RB to go the way of the play action, but if he reads no protection on his assignment (due to line slant), he will just go to his assignment immediately.

Other times, especially if we are giving an RPO look, it's to get a read on the LB. The LB, more so against RPOs, will get his keys from the QB drop back. If the QB does a play action motion, even without a RB there, it will get the LB to move a certain way. Brice can then read the coverage better.
Last edited by AppStateNews on Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tAPPedInSports.net

Not affiliated with the above website

AppSt94
Posts: 11457
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Huntersville, NC
Has thanked: 7759 times
Been thanked: 4920 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by AppSt94 » Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:09 pm

bigdaddyg wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:55 pm
We went 10-2 in the regular season so I won’t absolutely pile on negativity but I am curious. I noticed that on more than one occasion when we ran a play action pass Chase faked a handoff to the wrong side. The back went one way and he simply did the fake. Never coached a football game in my life and never played a down but those plays looked messed up.
Admittedly, it looks odd. Given the frequency at which it happened, I have to wonder if it is by design.

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:25 pm

AppSt94 wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:09 pm
bigdaddyg wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:55 pm
We went 10-2 in the regular season so I won’t absolutely pile on negativity but I am curious. I noticed that on more than one occasion when we ran a play action pass Chase faked a handoff to the wrong side. The back went one way and he simply did the fake. Never coached a football game in my life and never played a down but those plays looked messed up.
Admittedly, it looks odd. Given the frequency at which it happened, I have to wonder if it is by design.
Again, I don’t know crap about coaching but anytime I’ve seen play action usually the back is lined up behind the QB and takes the fake to freeze the LB’s who hopefully bite one the run. If our back goes right and the QB fakes to nobody it kind of kills the deception and the backers can drop back faster and they take away the middle of the field. Seems like a wasted fake so to speak.

User avatar
appstatealum
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:45 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Charlotte/Gastonia
Has thanked: 3526 times
Been thanked: 1932 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by appstatealum » Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:53 pm

ASU3432Mi wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 12:20 pm
Did we ever run a screen? Also needed to utilize Tight Ends more and pass some to RBs out of backfield.
Bingo. So many times we could've opened lanes for running game and/or pulled defenders closer for deeper or mid-level throws, which seem to be Chase's strength. I can't tell you how many games I watched where it blew my mind that we didn't run screens, or even their "patented" Malik WR throw to alleviate the aggressive pass rush of our competitor.
The Appalachian State

User avatar
appstatealum
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:45 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Charlotte/Gastonia
Has thanked: 3526 times
Been thanked: 1932 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by appstatealum » Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:59 pm

AppStateNews wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pm
bigdaddyg wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:55 pm
We went 10-2 in the regular season so I won’t absolutely pile on negativity but I am curious. I noticed that on more than one occasion when we ran a play action pass Chase faked a handoff to the wrong side. The back went one way and he simply did the fake. Never coached a football game in my life and never played a down but those plays looked messed up.
Majority of the time it was because the line was slanted one way and RB had a pass protection assignment. The play as it's drawn up is for the RB to go the way of the play action, but if he reads no protection on his assignment (due to line slant), he will just go to his assignment immediately.

Other times, especially if we are giving an RPO look, it's to get a read on the LB. The LB, more so against RPOs, will get his keys from the QB drop back. If the QB does a play action motion, even without a RB there, it will get the LB to move a certain way. Brice can then read the coverage better.
This. There is so much that goes into play design and successful implementation of that design. The feeling I got was Ponce had "his" play design and didn't do the best job of adapting it to the talent we had and what would work best. I think Ponce has a solid mind for the game just felt like it didn't materialize with this group outside of a few instances. To me, the ECU game script was his best and it was downhill from there.
The Appalachian State

ericsaid
Posts: 1834
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 87 times
Been thanked: 456 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by ericsaid » Mon Dec 13, 2021 10:51 pm

appstatealum wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 10:03 am
May be an unpopular opinion, but I felt Ponce mismanaged our offensive talent and his play design/play calling depreciated as the season went on. I'm sure I'll get a few "arm chair OC" comments and the like, but I dont speak from a casual fan perspective.
I feel the comments at Louisiana Round 1 were telling. Clark said "sometimes the simplest game plan is the best" and a lot of times it seemed like just that, overly simple. A lot of things missing from the old Ponce/Satterfield offense. I assume the reason for the shift is that Chase isn't a true dual threat quarterback so a lot of his play sheet that is set-up by the QB being a threat to run is negated with a guy like Chase.

Ponce uses progressions to call the offense so I'd assume a lot of the screens and mis-direction are predicated on the QB run and without the QB run you can't progress to those misdirection and other deception calls.

User avatar
appstatealum
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:45 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Charlotte/Gastonia
Has thanked: 3526 times
Been thanked: 1932 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by appstatealum » Mon Dec 13, 2021 11:27 pm

ericsaid wrote:
Mon Dec 13, 2021 10:51 pm
appstatealum wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 10:03 am
May be an unpopular opinion, but I felt Ponce mismanaged our offensive talent and his play design/play calling depreciated as the season went on. I'm sure I'll get a few "arm chair OC" comments and the like, but I dont speak from a casual fan perspective.
I feel the comments at Louisiana Round 1 were telling. Clark said "sometimes the simplest game plan is the best" and a lot of times it seemed like just that, overly simple. A lot of things missing from the old Ponce/Satterfield offense. I assume the reason for the shift is that Chase isn't a true dual threat quarterback so a lot of his play sheet that is set-up by the QB being a threat to run is negated with a guy like Chase.

Ponce uses progressions to call the offense so I'd assume a lot of the screens and mis-direction are predicated on the QB run and without the QB run you can't progress to those misdirection and other deception calls.
Possibly. Should have adapted to his personnel though.
The Appalachian State

CharlotteApp05
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:18 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 241 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by CharlotteApp05 » Tue Dec 14, 2021 8:18 am

I also don't remember any of those Jet Sweep Virgil runs. That was successful early in his career and would have been an easy way to create more misdirection for the Defense to have to account for.

ericsaid
Posts: 1834
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 87 times
Been thanked: 456 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by ericsaid » Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:32 am

appstatealum wrote:
Mon Dec 13, 2021 11:27 pm
ericsaid wrote:
Mon Dec 13, 2021 10:51 pm
appstatealum wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 10:03 am
May be an unpopular opinion, but I felt Ponce mismanaged our offensive talent and his play design/play calling depreciated as the season went on. I'm sure I'll get a few "arm chair OC" comments and the like, but I dont speak from a casual fan perspective.
I feel the comments at Louisiana Round 1 were telling. Clark said "sometimes the simplest game plan is the best" and a lot of times it seemed like just that, overly simple. A lot of things missing from the old Ponce/Satterfield offense. I assume the reason for the shift is that Chase isn't a true dual threat quarterback so a lot of his play sheet that is set-up by the QB being a threat to run is negated with a guy like Chase.

Ponce uses progressions to call the offense so I'd assume a lot of the screens and mis-direction are predicated on the QB run and without the QB run you can't progress to those misdirection and other deception calls.
Possibly. Should have adapted to his personnel though.
I AGREE.

And think most of us agree on that here. Not sure if he got here with enough time to adapt and teach his offense?

User avatar
Rekdiver
Posts: 7736
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1506 times
Been thanked: 3910 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by Rekdiver » Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:52 am

Not a jab but a question. do we have the right coach for our Oline? Is he better suited for another position??

User avatar
goapps93
Posts: 3867
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Has thanked: 274 times
Been thanked: 974 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by goapps93 » Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:58 am

What we armchair coordinators have to remember is that we don't break down opponent's film like the coaches do nor do we actually put together a game plan. It's not as easy as we like to imagine it to be. There's more to play calling than just thinking, "hey, a jet sweep might work here." There are so many variables that occur that make a play work or keep it from working: down and distance, defensive tendencies, personnel, to name a few. There is also a defensive coordinator who has been and is game planning to stop the offense. And sometimes dudes just make plays. It's also important to remember that a play that "doesn't work" in the first quarter many times is run just to make another play work in the third quarter. It's easy to second guess from the stands, the recliner, or the couch, but that's all we're doing, second guessing. As we all know, hindsight is 20/20 and I would bet good money that Ponce and Co. are using it as well. But as much as plans are made and plays are called to be successful, sometimes, like I said earlier, dudes just make plays. That's the biggest variable.
WE ARE YOSEF!

User avatar
goapps93
Posts: 3867
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Has thanked: 274 times
Been thanked: 974 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by goapps93 » Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:01 am

Rekdiver wrote:
Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:52 am
Not a jab but a question. do we have the right coach for our Oline? Is he better suited for another position??
I've been wondering the same thing, Rekdiver. That's the one coaching spot I have concerns. I love Nic but I don't know if OL coach is the best place for him. I'm also willing to stick with him as he improves since he is early in his career.
WE ARE YOSEF!

User avatar
Rekdiver
Posts: 7736
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1506 times
Been thanked: 3910 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by Rekdiver » Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:53 am

goapps93 wrote:
Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:58 am
What we armchair coordinators have to remember is that we don't break down opponent's film like the coaches do nor do we actually put together a game plan. It's not as easy as we like to imagine it to be. There's more to play calling than just thinking, "hey, a jet sweep might work here." There are so many variables that occur that make a play work or keep it from working: down and distance, defensive tendencies, personnel, to name a few. There is also a defensive coordinator who has been and is game planning to stop the offense. And sometimes dudes just make plays. It's also important to remember that a play that "doesn't work" in the first quarter many times is run just to make another play work in the third quarter. It's easy to second guess from the stands, the recliner, or the couch, but that's all we're doing, second guessing. As we all know, hindsight is 20/20 and I would bet good money that Ponce and Co. are using it as well. But as much as plans are made and plays are called to be successful, sometimes, like I said earlier, dudes just make plays. That's the biggest variable.
I wont disagree with you but it looks like we stop at Plan "B" and arent quick enough to consider a Plan" C"

AppSt94
Posts: 11457
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Huntersville, NC
Has thanked: 7759 times
Been thanked: 4920 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by AppSt94 » Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:04 am

Rekdiver wrote:
Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:53 am
goapps93 wrote:
Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:58 am
What we armchair coordinators have to remember is that we don't break down opponent's film like the coaches do nor do we actually put together a game plan. It's not as easy as we like to imagine it to be. There's more to play calling than just thinking, "hey, a jet sweep might work here." There are so many variables that occur that make a play work or keep it from working: down and distance, defensive tendencies, personnel, to name a few. There is also a defensive coordinator who has been and is game planning to stop the offense. And sometimes dudes just make plays. It's also important to remember that a play that "doesn't work" in the first quarter many times is run just to make another play work in the third quarter. It's easy to second guess from the stands, the recliner, or the couch, but that's all we're doing, second guessing. As we all know, hindsight is 20/20 and I would bet good money that Ponce and Co. are using it as well. But as much as plans are made and plays are called to be successful, sometimes, like I said earlier, dudes just make plays. That's the biggest variable.
I wont disagree with you but it looks like we stop at Plan "B" and arent quick enough to consider a Plan" C"
They get 20 hours a week of prep time with these kids. I’m not sure how much you expect them to get accomplished in that time frame.

User avatar
Rekdiver
Posts: 7736
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1506 times
Been thanked: 3910 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by Rekdiver » Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:29 am

They have an entire offseason to add wrinkles.....

AppSt94
Posts: 11457
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Huntersville, NC
Has thanked: 7759 times
Been thanked: 4920 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by AppSt94 » Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:55 am

Rekdiver wrote:
Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:29 am
They have an entire offseason to add wrinkles.....
Yes. But you only have a finite time to practice said wrinkles on a weekly bases. What works against Marsha, may not work against CoVid Carolina.

Oldlknapp
Posts: 253
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 2:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 120 times

Re: Frank Ponce

Unread post by Oldlknapp » Tue Dec 14, 2021 1:42 pm

In the ULL case, they had “analyst” that were monitoring our signals. In fact, sometimes it seemed like they knew our plays before we did.
Perhaps it wasn’t so much a simple playbook, but rather they were ready for it.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”