UTSA did play at GaSt last year during transition while the Panthers were still playing a full CAA slate.
App at McNeese in 2014
- moonshine
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:25 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: High Country
- Has thanked: 299 times
- Been thanked: 782 times
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
Personally I'd like to see App play the game but would completely understand if Cobb buys it out. We could always use the Chapel-Hill excuse of wanting to open recruiting grounds for our program.
UTSA did play at GaSt last year during transition while the Panthers were still playing a full CAA slate.
UTSA did play at GaSt last year during transition while the Panthers were still playing a full CAA slate.
Picked up via free agency by the High Country All-Stars
- Kgfish
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:48 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Metro Charlotte Area
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
But if you listen closely Benson said our declaring prior to 6-1 increases the Sun Belt's SOS and revenue streams. I'm betting we don't make the trip.Yosef wrote:I agree. I'm also all about upholding our end of the bargain and not setting a precedent that we'll just buy ourselves out of an agreement we made.T-Dog wrote:I say we go if they want us to. Lake Charles is a lot of fun. We're ineligible for bowl games so it's not like we need to protect our strength of schedule.
No Generation Has The Right To Contract Debts Greater Than Can Be Paid Off During It's Own Existence.
George Washington
George Washington
-
appvette
- Posts: 709
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 8:48 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 388 times
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
I think people saying stuff like this are afraid fans of other schools on message boards will criticize us. That's not a reason to lower our SOS and play a game that will cost us money.wb247 wrote:Backing out would be incredibly hypocritical
There are a few schools that have developed a reputation for buying out games which might lead to other schools being hesitant to negotiating subsequent games. That's not the case here.
-
huskie3
- Posts: 4614
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2000 9:57 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Gaston County
- Has thanked: 703 times
- Been thanked: 663 times
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
keep the game as scheduled and move it to Boone! pay them $250,000 to come up. everyone is happy except the apps wanting to tailgate at McNeese.
Bring Your A Game!
-
AppinVA
- Posts: 14524
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 9:41 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3808 times
- Been thanked: 3538 times
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
If I were McNeese, I'd take the $250K, and schedule a home game against another team. Perhaps, we can transfer the contract (it's a home and home) to Wofford or Furman.huskie3 wrote:keep the game as scheduled and move it to Boone! pay them $250,000 to come up. everyone is happy except the apps wanting to tailgate at McNeese.
"Some people call me hillbilly. Some people call me mountain man. You can call me Appalachian. Appalachian's what I am."-- Del McCoury Band
-
Yosef84
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:27 am
- Has thanked: 1402 times
- Been thanked: 2193 times
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
huskie3 wrote:keep the game as scheduled and move it to Boone! pay them $250,000 to come up. everyone is happy except the apps wanting to tailgate at McNeese.
That would be a $250K buy out that they could get for NOT playing a game at all, PLUS another $250K. So, instead of netting a tidy profit, we pay out $500K? I don't think so. The bottom line is that we aren't just arbitrarily making this decision. The situation changed significantly and this game no longer makes financial sense.
- wb247
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:55 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 99 times
- Been thanked: 79 times
- Contact:
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
When I think back on all of the discussions about us not being able to get good OOC home games and never with a team from FBS, I can't help but think that we are in a position to put our money where our mouth is. As we know all too well, for every FCS team that gets a great home game, there's another team with an undesirable away game. That is, unless we think scheduling is only a one-way street where everyone else is expected to bend to our will. This isn't a case of actively seeking an away game at an FCS school and I'm certainly not suggesting that we make it a future practice. In this case, it's already contracted. I'd like to see us honor our commitment.TheMoody1 wrote:wb247 wrote:Backing out would be incredibly hypocritical
How so?
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10166
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 414 times
- Been thanked: 2693 times
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
Understand the sentiment completely, but I don't think the Sun Belt will allow it.wb247 wrote:When I think back on all of the discussions about us not being able to get good OOC home games and never with a team from FBS, I can't help but think that we are in a position to put our money where our mouth is. As we know all too well, for every FCS team that gets a great home game, there's another team with an undesirable away game. That is, unless we think scheduling is only a one-way street where everyone else is expected to bend to our will. This isn't a case of actively seeking an away game at an FCS school and I'm certainly not suggesting that we make it a future practice. In this case, it's already contracted. I'd like to see us honor our commitment.TheMoody1 wrote:wb247 wrote:Backing out would be incredibly hypocritical
How so?
- ASUMountaineer
- Posts: 7250
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:20 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: State of Appalachian
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: App at McNeese in 2014
The contract (commitment) is to play the game, or to pay McNeese State $250,000. If we pay them $250,000 to not play the game, then that is honoring the commitment. Seems fairly straightforward to me.wb247 wrote:When I think back on all of the discussions about us not being able to get good OOC home games and never with a team from FBS, I can't help but think that we are in a position to put our money where our mouth is. As we know all too well, for every FCS team that gets a great home game, there's another team with an undesirable away game. That is, unless we think scheduling is only a one-way street where everyone else is expected to bend to our will. This isn't a case of actively seeking an away game at an FCS school and I'm certainly not suggesting that we make it a future practice. In this case, it's already contracted. I'd like to see us honor our commitment.TheMoody1 wrote:wb247 wrote:Backing out would be incredibly hypocritical
How so?
Poster formerly known as AppState03 (MMB) and currently known as ASUMountaineer everywhere else.