Epic game - Ga vs GT
-
Mjohn1988
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 10:10 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1826 times
- WVAPPeer
- Posts: 12458
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:14 am
- School: Other
- Location: Born: Almost Heaven
- Has thanked: 4948 times
- Been thanked: 2679 times
Re: Epic game - Ga vs GT
QB at Texas A&,M when we beat them
"Montani Semper Liberi"
The Dude Abides!!!
The Dude Abides!!!
-
Stonewall
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3605 times
- Been thanked: 4612 times
-
Saint3333
- Posts: 14908
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
- Has thanked: 4335 times
- Been thanked: 6736 times
Re: Epic game - Ga vs GT
Clark and Company outcoached Jimbo all night. It was a beautiful game plan vs a stubborn coach.
- AppDub
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:52 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1720 times
- Been thanked: 850 times
-
AppSt94
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 8201 times
- Been thanked: 5212 times
Re: Epic game - Ga vs GT
So here is my take. On that fumble that allowed Georgia to get the ball back to tie the game, it looked like the safety hit King in the head with the crown of the helmet. I understand that it isn’t a penalty by definition since King wasn’t considered defenseless, but if the rule is about safety, how is that hit deemed more safe?
-
Mjohn1988
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 10:10 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1826 times
Re: Epic game - Ga vs GT
I don’t think the rule just applies to “defenseless” players. I believe targeting could have been called on that play.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:27 amSo here is my take. On that fumble that allowed Georgia to get the ball back to tie the game, it looked like the safety hit King in the head with the crown of the helmet. I understand that it isn’t a penalty by definition since King wasn’t considered defenseless, but if the rule is about safety, how is that hit deemed more safe?
-
AppSt94
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 8201 times
- Been thanked: 5212 times
Re: Epic game - Ga vs GT
Completely agree. One of the comments that is always part of the conversation is that the receiver of the hit was a defenseless player.Mjohn1988 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 2:02 pmI don’t think the rule just applies to “defenseless” players. I believe targeting could have been called on that play.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:27 amSo here is my take. On that fumble that allowed Georgia to get the ball back to tie the game, it looked like the safety hit King in the head with the crown of the helmet. I understand that it isn’t a penalty by definition since King wasn’t considered defenseless, but if the rule is about safety, how is that hit deemed more safe?
-
311neers
- Posts: 6103
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 10:34 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 2920 times
- Been thanked: 2133 times
Re: Epic game - Ga vs GT
There were a few targeting calls missed last night. On both sides. The guys are almost too fast to the naked eye.Mjohn1988 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 2:02 pmI don’t think the rule just applies to “defenseless” players. I believe targeting could have been called on that play.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:27 amSo here is my take. On that fumble that allowed Georgia to get the ball back to tie the game, it looked like the safety hit King in the head with the crown of the helmet. I understand that it isn’t a penalty by definition since King wasn’t considered defenseless, but if the rule is about safety, how is that hit deemed more safe?
-
Mjohn1988
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 10:10 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1826 times
Re: Epic game - Ga vs GT
I was pulling for GT, not sure why, but I wouldn’t have wanted a targeting call on that fumble to have made such a huge difference in that game.311neers wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 5:17 pmThere were a few targeting calls missed last night. On both sides. The guys are almost too fast to the naked eye.Mjohn1988 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 2:02 pmI don’t think the rule just applies to “defenseless” players. I believe targeting could have been called on that play.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:27 amSo here is my take. On that fumble that allowed Georgia to get the ball back to tie the game, it looked like the safety hit King in the head with the crown of the helmet. I understand that it isn’t a penalty by definition since King wasn’t considered defenseless, but if the rule is about safety, how is that hit deemed more safe?
-
311neers
- Posts: 6103
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 10:34 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 2920 times
- Been thanked: 2133 times
Re: Epic game - Ga vs GT
Heck of a hit from that safety. Free runner downhill, I love it. We used to fill holes like that and pop heads.Mjohn1988 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 5:22 pmI was pulling for GT, not sure why, but I wouldn’t have wanted a targeting call on that fumble to have made such a huge difference in that game.311neers wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 5:17 pmThere were a few targeting calls missed last night. On both sides. The guys are almost too fast to the naked eye.Mjohn1988 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 2:02 pmI don’t think the rule just applies to “defenseless” players. I believe targeting could have been called on that play.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:27 amSo here is my take. On that fumble that allowed Georgia to get the ball back to tie the game, it looked like the safety hit King in the head with the crown of the helmet. I understand that it isn’t a penalty by definition since King wasn’t considered defenseless, but if the rule is about safety, how is that hit deemed more safe?
- proasu89
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:33 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1015 times
- Been thanked: 858 times