PAC-12 melt down
-
- Posts: 7134
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3457 times
- Been thanked: 4311 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
Rumor mill...SMU trying to buy their way in to the ACC.Potential trickle down effect to SunBelt ?
-
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:04 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 530 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
I agree that the grass is pretty green for the SunBelt right now. Hopefully the "Haves" see the value in diversity and the appeal of some new teams each year.mike87 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 4:12 pmPretty loose interpretation of "friend" but otherwise spot on. I think the Sun Belt gets it. Probably were backed into getting it because they had no other real choice but I think it works for us in the long run.kornegaylw wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 1:35 pmI don't see whats happened driving many away from CFB but I do see people caring less about "conference play"...Sure they'll tune in to see their team team play a rival but are they really gonna care when Maryland plays Washington or Missouri plays South Carolina? I would say no they won't. What makes CFB great is being able to brag to your low life Georgia Southern friend that App beat up them up on Saturday. Who's gonna care if your Syracuse Orange beat up the Cal or if your Oregon Ducks beat up Rutgers?MrCraig wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 1:07 pmThe Sunbelt has, seemingly overnight, become the conference for folks who like college football "the way it was." Regional footprints, close/intense rivalries, kids are getting NIL $$ but not 6-figure stuff, transfers happen but aren't earth-shaking...
I'm not sure if that's necessarily "good" for the Sunbelt in the future, but I think it makes the conference more interesting. SEC, Big 10, and Big 12 have just become the minor league conferences for the NFL. ACC, Sunbelt, MWC are more like what college football was meant to be.
-
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:04 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 530 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
I can get on board with your line of thought if you pivot a bit and say that the "Haves" are willing to kick out the Rutgers and Vanderbuilts from their neighborhood and allow the Appalachains move in.canes_mj wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 5:38 pmAgree with the sentiment of the above poster. Unless you're a fan of the specific team, no one cares if it's them playing a low level conference opponent. I actually like the merging because you're concentrating the teams that people want to see play each other into conferences....so for games not involving App, just as neutral CFB fans, fans of the sport, we're going to get more better games. Look at the SEC now...every week they have 2 or 3 games featuring ranked teams. And now it's going to get better w/ Texas and OU. I want to see Texas and OU play Bama, UGa, LSU, etc...not Texas Tech or Iowa State. Same with Southern Cal, Oregon, Washington...I want to see them play Michigan, Ohio State, Penn St, etc. Same with Clemson and Florida State wherever they go eventually...sorry but those games vs Syracuse and BC just don't do it for me.
I feel for the have-nots and the left-outs, but they need to come to grips with reality as far as their place in the college football landscape. They're basically G5 programs in P5 conferences. The reason App and the Sunbelt and the G5 conferences work well is because most fans know who and what we are for the most part. Alabama, Clemson, etc, and App are all FBS citizens; but we don't live in the same neighborhoods.
- AppWyo
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:25 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 536 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
What we have in the Sunbelt East is awesome, let us not screw it up by wanting to be in a different conference. We should not make the mistake that some schools make thinking that they would get more respect if they were in a different conference.
Every school in the Sunbelt expects to win every game, especially the Sunbelt East. That is rare in most conferences. We have the closest thing to what we once had in the SoCon. It is fine to strive for something better and higher, however, the reality is that we can compete in the Sunbelt and we are not having to sell our soul to do so.
The PAC 4 would be better off merging with the Mountain West Conference right now than staying with an Autonomous Conference.
Look at Maryland, have they gotten any better in football since they left the ACC?
Every school in the Sunbelt expects to win every game, especially the Sunbelt East. That is rare in most conferences. We have the closest thing to what we once had in the SoCon. It is fine to strive for something better and higher, however, the reality is that we can compete in the Sunbelt and we are not having to sell our soul to do so.
The PAC 4 would be better off merging with the Mountain West Conference right now than staying with an Autonomous Conference.
Look at Maryland, have they gotten any better in football since they left the ACC?
-
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 10:51 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 954 times
- Been thanked: 1107 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2 ... e-trouble/AppWyo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 9:25 pmWhat we have in the Sunbelt East is awesome, let us not screw it up by wanting to be in a different conference. We should not make the mistake that some schools make thinking that they would get more respect if they were in a different conference.
Every school in the Sunbelt expects to win every game, especially the Sunbelt East. That is rare in most conferences. We have the closest thing to what we once had in the SoCon. It is fine to strive for something better and higher, however, the reality is that we can compete in the Sunbelt and we are not having to sell our soul to do so.
The PAC 4 would be better off merging with the Mountain West Conference right now than staying with an Autonomous Conference.
Look at Maryland, have they gotten any better in football since they left the ACC?
Maryland’s average announced attendance of 31,920 ranks 66th among 133 Football Bowl Subdivision schools and places the program on a tier with Boise State, Appalachian State, Navy and Stanford. The Terrapins have the second-worst attendance in the Big Ten, behind only Northwestern
Guess who is trending UP and who is trending down?
- canes_mj
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:41 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Hillsborough, NC
- Has thanked: 105 times
- Been thanked: 303 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
Agree; I wish there was a provision to remove teams; Vandy, Rutgers, maybe Northwestern...Wake would never have gotten an invite. I've had a lot of conversations about this with friends. ACC could realize their mistake and remove BC for example. Totally agree. But on App, no... no way App ever would, could, or should be P5. It's not realistic even in the wildest of hypothetical scenarios.kornegaylw wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 8:49 pmI can get on board with your line of thought if you pivot a bit and say that the "Haves" are willing to kick out the Rutgers and Vanderbuilts from their neighborhood and allow the Appalachains move in.canes_mj wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 5:38 pmAgree with the sentiment of the above poster. Unless you're a fan of the specific team, no one cares if it's them playing a low level conference opponent. I actually like the merging because you're concentrating the teams that people want to see play each other into conferences....so for games not involving App, just as neutral CFB fans, fans of the sport, we're going to get more better games. Look at the SEC now...every week they have 2 or 3 games featuring ranked teams. And now it's going to get better w/ Texas and OU. I want to see Texas and OU play Bama, UGa, LSU, etc...not Texas Tech or Iowa State. Same with Southern Cal, Oregon, Washington...I want to see them play Michigan, Ohio State, Penn St, etc. Same with Clemson and Florida State wherever they go eventually...sorry but those games vs Syracuse and BC just don't do it for me.
I feel for the have-nots and the left-outs, but they need to come to grips with reality as far as their place in the college football landscape. They're basically G5 programs in P5 conferences. The reason App and the Sunbelt and the G5 conferences work well is because most fans know who and what we are for the most part. Alabama, Clemson, etc, and App are all FBS citizens; but we don't live in the same neighborhoods.
- AtlAppMan
- Posts: 2242
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: ATL
- Has thanked: 110 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... roadblocks
I don't think SMU is going to buy their way into ACC.
SMU also had been bandied about as a potential addition to the ACC, and those conversations aren't headed anywhere, either, sources said.
I don't think SMU is going to buy their way into ACC.
SMU also had been bandied about as a potential addition to the ACC, and those conversations aren't headed anywhere, either, sources said.
-
- Posts: 5965
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:32 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 2296 times
- Been thanked: 3935 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
Recurring theme for SMU.AtlAppMan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 10:27 amhttps://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... roadblocks
I don't think SMU is going to buy their way into ACC.
SMU also had been bandied about as a potential addition to the ACC, and those conversations aren't headed anywhere, either, sources said.
Paid Pony Express
Today I Give My All For Appalachian State!!
#FreeMillerHillForMoMoney!!
#FreeMillerHillForMoMoney!!
-
- Posts: 2766
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:00 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 2040 times
- Been thanked: 1628 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
Just saw this on MSN...and I know it's not gonna happen...but still fun to consider:
Hey, ACC, If You’re Looking For Good Football, Try Closer To Home
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/he ... 9dce&ei=59
Hey, ACC, If You’re Looking For Good Football, Try Closer To Home
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/he ... 9dce&ei=59
-
- Posts: 6903
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 962 times
- Been thanked: 1865 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
Like you said it won't happen and we all know the NC schools won't want us. We also have a lot of other issues that make me not even want to join the ACC if it grows to add west coast and Texas schools along with the fact we don't have the money to compete. I would imagine the TV money increase alone would not do it and we would need the YC to bring in probably 20-25M more a year just to even tread water. Ticket prices would double and games would be so far that most fans just could not manage it. I like that we are in a regional conference now. I would even be in favor of the league dropping Texas State to add ECU if they would join but I really don't want to be in a league with west coast schools. I was glad NWMSU and Idaho left the league just from a travel standpoint.Rick83 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 11:02 amJust saw this on MSN...and I know it's not gonna happen...but still fun to consider:
Hey, ACC, If You’re Looking For Good Football, Try Closer To Home
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/he ... 9dce&ei=59
-
- Posts: 11554
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7847 times
- Been thanked: 4972 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
Our infrastructure, both the school and the town of Boone weren’t ready for an invite to the AAC. Highly doubt we are ready for the ACC to come to town.
-
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:04 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 530 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
The football team may be on par with low level ACC schools but the Town of Boones' infrastructure and the mindset of the current members of the ACC will need to change before Appalachian will be in the ACC. If any current teams leave the ACC then that mindset might change. Another great few years with big wins will help our cause. Patience is key here.canes_mj wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 10:11 amAgree; I wish there was a provision to remove teams; Vandy, Rutgers, maybe Northwestern...Wake would never have gotten an invite. I've had a lot of conversations about this with friends. ACC could realize their mistake and remove BC for example. Totally agree. But on App, no... no way App ever would, could, or should be P5. It's not realistic even in the wildest of hypothetical scenarios.kornegaylw wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 8:49 pmI can get on board with your line of thought if you pivot a bit and say that the "Haves" are willing to kick out the Rutgers and Vanderbuilts from their neighborhood and allow the Appalachains move in.canes_mj wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 5:38 pmAgree with the sentiment of the above poster. Unless you're a fan of the specific team, no one cares if it's them playing a low level conference opponent. I actually like the merging because you're concentrating the teams that people want to see play each other into conferences....so for games not involving App, just as neutral CFB fans, fans of the sport, we're going to get more better games. Look at the SEC now...every week they have 2 or 3 games featuring ranked teams. And now it's going to get better w/ Texas and OU. I want to see Texas and OU play Bama, UGa, LSU, etc...not Texas Tech or Iowa State. Same with Southern Cal, Oregon, Washington...I want to see them play Michigan, Ohio State, Penn St, etc. Same with Clemson and Florida State wherever they go eventually...sorry but those games vs Syracuse and BC just don't do it for me.
I feel for the have-nots and the left-outs, but they need to come to grips with reality as far as their place in the college football landscape. They're basically G5 programs in P5 conferences. The reason App and the Sunbelt and the G5 conferences work well is because most fans know who and what we are for the most part. Alabama, Clemson, etc, and App are all FBS citizens; but we don't live in the same neighborhoods.
- appdaze
- Posts: 4778
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:08 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 1743 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
The only way we ever get in one of the big conferences is when after 10-20 or so years of all this pure greed based realignment blows up in everyone's faces that these super conferences are forced to break up again and form more regional conferences. The SBC would probably be split with some schools joining former P5s in the regional rebuild. Right now the teams in the SBC just need to sit back and watch the P5 super conference sand castles wash away in the sea.
-
- Posts: 14488
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
- Has thanked: 4057 times
- Been thanked: 6273 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
Not ready for Tulane, Tulsa, and UAB?
We’re hosting the biggest draw this year, the AAC isn’t really more difficult than the SBC.
Agreed on the ACC.
-
- Posts: 2766
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:00 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 2040 times
- Been thanked: 1628 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
I agree completely with what you've posted. I think the point of the article is to suggest adding schools like us or Marshall as opposed to going out West. Since football seems to be the driving force behind this conference realignment craziness, and we both have great football programs with strong fan support. The ACC is preparing to add members because they're anticipating losing some like Florida State, Clemson, perhaps Miami...which are their strongest football members historically.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:32 pmLike you said it won't happen and we all know the NC schools won't want us. We also have a lot of other issues that make me not even want to join the ACC if it grows to add west coast and Texas schools along with the fact we don't have the money to compete. I would imagine the TV money increase alone would not do it and we would need the YC to bring in probably 20-25M more a year just to even tread water. Ticket prices would double and games would be so far that most fans just could not manage it. I like that we are in a regional conference now. I would even be in favor of the league dropping Texas State to add ECU if they would join but I really don't want to be in a league with west coast schools. I was glad NWMSU and Idaho left the league just from a travel standpoint.Rick83 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 11:02 amJust saw this on MSN...and I know it's not gonna happen...but still fun to consider:
Hey, ACC, If You’re Looking For Good Football, Try Closer To Home
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/he ... 9dce&ei=59
-
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:04 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 530 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
The city's of Tulsa, New Orleans & Birmingham have substantially better tourism resource capacity within the greater city limits. They also have commerically seriviced airports within 20 minutes of campus. Boone does not.
-
- Posts: 11554
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7847 times
- Been thanked: 4972 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
It’s a bigger issue than on field competition and butts in the seat.
-
- Posts: 7134
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3457 times
- Been thanked: 4311 times
- appdaze
- Posts: 4778
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:08 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 1743 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
Liazzos catering out of the convention center has fed some of the visiting teams if I remember right.
-
- Posts: 6903
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 962 times
- Been thanked: 1865 times
Re: PAC-12 melt down
For sure but I hear complaints about our lack of NIL now and being called up to ACC would make that issue even worse, unless we increase giving big time.Rick83 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 2:29 pmI agree completely with what you've posted. I think the point of the article is to suggest adding schools like us or Marshall as opposed to going out West. Since football seems to be the driving force behind this conference realignment craziness, and we both have great football programs with strong fan support. The ACC is preparing to add members because they're anticipating losing some like Florida State, Clemson, perhaps Miami...which are their strongest football members historically.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:32 pmLike you said it won't happen and we all know the NC schools won't want us. We also have a lot of other issues that make me not even want to join the ACC if it grows to add west coast and Texas schools along with the fact we don't have the money to compete. I would imagine the TV money increase alone would not do it and we would need the YC to bring in probably 20-25M more a year just to even tread water. Ticket prices would double and games would be so far that most fans just could not manage it. I like that we are in a regional conference now. I would even be in favor of the league dropping Texas State to add ECU if they would join but I really don't want to be in a league with west coast schools. I was glad NWMSU and Idaho left the league just from a travel standpoint.Rick83 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 11:02 amJust saw this on MSN...and I know it's not gonna happen...but still fun to consider:
Hey, ACC, If You’re Looking For Good Football, Try Closer To Home
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/he ... 9dce&ei=59
The ACC scares me in general anyway due to the fact their leadership is getting played by ND. You see that ND is a full voting member and putting pressure on league to take Cal and Stanford but they are independent in football? ACC leadership has quite the test in front of them right now. There is a real chance they end up as a G5 league and we have a P3 by the end.