Pre-season picks via supermarket mag research...
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:53 am
Lindy's and Athlon (?) had us last, or one position better in the Belt.
http://www.yosefscabin.com/forum/
He's bringing in quality kids on and off the court, don't think the statement of he has x amount of years needs to be mentioned.Stonewall wrote:Thinking Jim has two years to show substantial improvement ...and will.
Of course it does. We are now in the big leagues and don't have the time to wait for someone to build a great program.proasu89 wrote:He's bringing in quality kids on and off the court, don't think the statement of he has x amount of years needs to be mentioned.Stonewall wrote:Thinking Jim has two years to show substantial improvement ...and will.
1) Pretty sure his point wasn't that the statement was wrong, but that it unnecessarily implies that Fox is on some sort of hot seat. Every coach who isn't already winning big is on the clock to one degree or another.appgrouch wrote:Of course it does. We are now in the big leagues and don't have the time to wait for someone to build a great program.proasu89 wrote:He's bringing in quality kids on and off the court, don't think the statement of he has x amount of years needs to be mentioned.Stonewall wrote:Thinking Jim has two years to show substantial improvement ...and will.
I know, but the people that think that FCS-FBS was a D2-D1 jump, don't.EastHallApp wrote:1) Pretty sure his point wasn't that the statement was wrong, but that it unnecessarily implies that Fox is on some sort of hot seat. Every coach who isn't already winning big is on the clock to one degree or another.appgrouch wrote:Of course it does. We are now in the big leagues and don't have the time to wait for someone to build a great program.proasu89 wrote:He's bringing in quality kids on and off the court, don't think the statement of he has x amount of years needs to be mentioned.Stonewall wrote:Thinking Jim has two years to show substantial improvement ...and will.
2) We are in fact going to wait for the coach to build the program. We aren't UK or Duke, and we can't just bring in a haul of 5* rent-a-players to win immediately.
3) The Sun Belt isn't much more "big league" than the SoCon was. It's a little tougher, but this isn't an FCS-FBS jump. Just moved from one mid-major to another.
EastHallApp wrote:1) Pretty sure his point wasn't that the statement was wrong, but that it unnecessarily implies that Fox is on some sort of hot seat. Every coach who isn't already winning big is on the clock to one degree or another.appgrouch wrote:Of course it does. We are now in the big leagues and don't have the time to wait for someone to build a great program.proasu89 wrote:He's bringing in quality kids on and off the court, don't think the statement of he has x amount of years needs to be mentioned.Stonewall wrote:Thinking Jim has two years to show substantial improvement ...and will.
2) We are in fact going to wait for the coach to build the program. We aren't UK or Duke, and we can't just bring in a haul of 5* rent-a-players to win immediately.
3) The Sun Belt isn't much more "big league" than the SoCon was. It's a little tougher, but this isn't an FCS-FBS jump. Just moved from one mid-major to another.
You're exactly right about the 2-6 record in close finishes. We had a few more that slipped away too in the final minutes, particularly a few early season games. Nothing replaces on court experience.EastHallApp wrote:From the outside, we're a 9-22 team that lost its leading scorer. I'd say that usually means we're in for a bad year too.
Taking a closer look, though, we're entering year three of a total rebuild. We played a lot of freshmen and sophomores last year in a system that takes time to learn. We were a not-horrific 7-13 in the league, just two games out of sixth place. And we were 2-6 in games decided by 4 points or less, including a couple truly bizarre finishes - which means we either didn't know how to close games, were just unlucky, or a combination of the two.
Taken that way, I think we have a chance to be better.