Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Tanyi
-
appstate77
- Posts: 3005
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:49 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: South Carolina
- Has thanked: 1469 times
- Been thanked: 980 times
- Contact:
-
Rekdiver
- Posts: 7736
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1506 times
- Been thanked: 3910 times
-
appdaze
- Posts: 4782
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:08 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 1744 times
Re: Tanyi
Rekdiver wrote:Very Interesting....ANd we dont have a umbrella liability policy?
I second that comment. That was my first thought as well. I still don't believe students should be involved on the "judicial" side of a conduct board. I'm sure this will have an influence on future decisions of this type especially with the expediency of the process.
-
T-Dog
- Posts: 6982
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:35 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 285 times
- Been thanked: 2979 times
Re: Tanyi
There were changes after this fiasco. The student conduct board no longer hears sexual misconduct charges, as they shouldn't.
The accuser in this case had to explain her side of the story several times and only learned the accused were allowed back on campus for a re-trial after running into them on campus. Also, the burden of proof wasn't beyond a reasonable doubt, which is why the county DA didn't press charges.
This was a sad chapter and mistakes were made in many different ways to both the accuser and accused.
The accuser in this case had to explain her side of the story several times and only learned the accused were allowed back on campus for a re-trial after running into them on campus. Also, the burden of proof wasn't beyond a reasonable doubt, which is why the county DA didn't press charges.
This was a sad chapter and mistakes were made in many different ways to both the accuser and accused.