Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:13 pm
Right?
http://www.yosefscabin.com/forum/
Start Lamb
Page 1 of 16
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:16 pm
Yes
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:17 pm
Yes
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:22 pm
YES!!!!!
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:22 pm
Definitely.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:26 pm
NO ---
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:27 pm
Lamb, 100%.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:28 pm
from this point forward yes.
He's a better QB than Kam. And I love and support Kam.
He's a better QB than Kam. And I love and support Kam.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:30 pm
Possibly. 
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:31 pm
It has to be given serious consideration. We did it in 2006 and that worked out pretty well.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:32 pm
Got to
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:36 pm
He has a better arm and for sure. More of a calm presence in the pocket. Great footwork and mobility. And the advantage of starting a kid with 4 years of eligibility over a guy with one can not be understated.
Nothing against Kam but we have to be utilitarian.
Nothing against Kam but we have to be utilitarian.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:38 pm
If I'm wrong I will be the first guy on here to give all of you kudos --- BUT, there is no way, unless Kam is hurt, that you bench your leader after 3/4 of one game against a team the ESPN guys today agreed that they could be 10-1 going into Ohio State game --- Those were 9 returning defensive starters on a Big 10 team --- Heck, some of you guys are still calling for Malik Barnes --- Kam is the starter - PERIOD!!!
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:41 pm
I'm not ready to dump KB yet. While Lamb looked good, I'm not sure you start someone after just one series in a game. The circumstances were different. That is not to say before all is said and done that Lamb is not the guy but its too soon for me.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:44 pm
No for all of the reasons that WVAPPEER stated. You are entitled to your opinions but please stop sniffing glue before posting such things.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:44 pm
At this point,that does seem to be a good possibility.Kam seems to be to conservative in his playmaking. P.S.Is GSU that good,or is NCSU that bad?
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:46 pm
Don't bench Kam for that. Lamb wasn't playing all the Michigan starters the whole time he was in there. The few starters still left in weren't playing with the same amount of ferocity they had in the first half as they had already won the game. Yes both QBs played in the same game but its almost like they played different teams between the first half and the second half.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:48 pm
There should be no QB controversy. One is a quarterback, the other is Kam Bryant. Good athlete, and maybe a good backup, but not a FBS starter.AppSt94 wrote:No for all of the reasons that WVAPPEER stated. You are entitled to your opinions but please stop sniffing glue before posting such things.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:50 pm
I hope Coach learned last year what happens when you wait too long to make a change that should have been obvious to anyone watching the knew anything about the Spread. As I said on chat, if we are serious about beating So. Miss Lamb will be the starter from this point on.
Re: Start Lamb
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:50 pm
You have an opinion. You must be sniffing glueAppinVA wrote:There should be no QB controversy. One is a quarterback, the other is Kam Bryant. Good athlete, and maybe a good backup, but not a FBS starter.AppSt94 wrote:No for all of the reasons that WVAPPEER stated. You are entitled to your opinions but please stop sniffing glue before posting such things.
