Looks like Barbour will start at WR

App95
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:28 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by App95 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 11:16 am

http://www.journalnow.com/sports/asu/fo ... b2370.html

According to Tommy, Barbour will start with the other veterans, Lewis is in the mix and surprisingly Meadors may redshirt. Dante Jones is barely on the two deep and Capel has no mention. Stepp says Bobo is the "best receiver in the room right now."

User avatar
AtlAppMan
Posts: 2243
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: ATL
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 1489 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by AtlAppMan » Sat Aug 23, 2014 11:44 am

What really jumps out at you is our lack of height in the WR group. I hope these guys can run good routes because they will not have the physical size advantage, nor as Stepp states, overwhelming speed.

Looks like the coaches are continuing to invest in the future with the list of likely redshirts.

The more I am hearing from various practice and coach's interviews the more clear it is to me that the coaches have decided to weight their decisions towards a longer term foundation vs shorter term gains. I am not judging them but rather indicating that I may need to temper my expectations for this year while understanding the strategy. Short term pain for long term gain.

MDaniels84
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:47 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 414 times
Been thanked: 464 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by MDaniels84 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 11:55 am

Lack of height , yes but this corp is very comparable in terms of size that we had last season. Malachi is our biggest receiver and Peacock and Washington had tons of experience but neither were particularly big.

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8282
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 932 times
Been thanked: 3950 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by firemoose » Sat Aug 23, 2014 12:13 pm

AtlAppMan wrote:What really jumps out at you is our lack of height in the WR group. I hope these guys can run good routes because they will not have the physical size advantage, nor as Stepp states, overwhelming speed.

Looks like the coaches are continuing to invest in the future with the list of likely redshirts.

The more I am hearing from various practice and coach's interviews the more clear it is to me that the coaches have decided to weight their decisions towards a longer term foundation vs shorter term gains. I am not judging them but rather indicating that I may need to temper my expectations for this year while understanding the strategy. Short term pain for long term gain.
A lot has to do with the fact that we missed on the taller receivers we were after. Of the offers so far this year 14 of them are 6' 3" or taller. I expect more to go out as we find them. It's just not that easy to find good, tall receivers that don't get snapped up by P5 programs (and a few G5's). Hopefully we'll find one with this class.

As to the other point, I've mentioned several times that we are in a process and we have to balance classes, which includes balancing positions as well. These next few years are the hardest and sometimes good players will be shirted in order to hopefully not have a gap come graduation time. 17 receivers on the roster. 2 deep is 8. Travel squad is 9-10. Better to shirt a couple of potential 1's than to have them stuck behind someone in their same class for their whole 4 years here. We've got several kids who may not be as good as Meadors or some of the other possible redshirts but who are plenty good enough for the second spot on the two deep. You have to spread the best players out just in case you have a bad recruiting year and miss on your targets. Even the P5's can whiff on a class and that's why they poach off of G5's in the last couple of weeks. And shirts can always be pulled if need be.

AppAttack
Posts: 483
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 6:49 pm
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by AppAttack » Sat Aug 23, 2014 12:20 pm

Well, we had a really tall receiver, but...

We'll be like some of those New England Patriot teams with Welker, Edelman, etc...

mtnjax
Posts: 1594
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 111 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by mtnjax » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:18 pm

The benefit of putting shirts on Meadors, Noil, and Armstrong is that, like the OL, they will have a year to dedicate to getting bigger, stronger, faster and a year to really learn the offense

User avatar
DaphneUrquhart
Posts: 2053
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:58 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Mayberry
Has thanked: 1675 times
Been thanked: 1478 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by DaphneUrquhart » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:10 pm

While I can see the advantage to being a tall WR, I'd gladly take a shorter WR with strong work ethic and the will to win. As I recall, Matt Cline was no giant, but he always seemed to catch everything thrown his way and kept going after some pretty rough hits.

We don't have to have superstars to win games. We do have to have guys who are convinced that they'll win every battle for a ball in the air anywhere near them. Four yards per play can win a bunch of games...
If serving is beneath you, then leading is beyond you.

#GiveYosef

moehler
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:01 am
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by moehler » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:41 pm

what worries me is can they get open against a physical secondary, we are going against bigger, stronger, defensive backs who are going to try and jam them at the line, and reroute them. Also a problem in the redzone, I don't think this group is going to out jump anyone in the endzone. On the positive, if this group is as fast as being advertised, one missed tackle on a simple 5 yd slant, turns into a 70 yd td.

User avatar
moonshine
Posts: 2203
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:25 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: High Country
Has thanked: 289 times
Been thanked: 755 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by moonshine » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:56 pm

moehler wrote:what worries me is can they get open against a physical secondary, we are going against bigger, stronger, defensive backs who are going to try and jam them at the line, and reroute them. Also a problem in the redzone, I don't think this group is going to out jump anyone in the endzone. On the positive, if this group is as fast as being advertised, one missed tackle on a simple 5 yd slant, turns into a 70 yd td.
You touched on my biggest concern for this young WR corp especially in the season opener. I can see how a physical defense that plays a lot of bump n run coverage could give our offense fits. Hopefully the coaches utilize some motion if they see the guys are struggling to release off the press coverage.
Picked up via free agency by the High Country All-Stars

sixtoes9134
Posts: 1245
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:42 am
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 278 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by sixtoes9134 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:05 pm

At least our TEs have good physical size. I'm not too worried about it.

Peacock and Washington did pretty well at UGA for themselves.

User avatar
JTApps1
Posts: 2724
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:18 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Belmont
Has thanked: 647 times
Been thanked: 1210 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by JTApps1 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:45 pm

AtlAppMan wrote:What really jumps out at you is our lack of height in the WR group. I hope these guys can run good routes because they will not have the physical size advantage, nor as Stepp states, overwhelming speed.

Looks like the coaches are continuing to invest in the future with the list of likely redshirts.

The more I am hearing from various practice and coach's interviews the more clear it is to me that the coaches have decided to weight their decisions towards a longer term foundation vs shorter term gains. I am not judging them but rather indicating that I may need to temper my expectations for this year while understanding the strategy. Short term pain for long term gain.
Where are you seeing that we don't have speed? Stepp said Mcguire lacks speed but is physical, but guys like Lewis, Barbour, Sumler, and Hopkins are burners. Meadors would have likely made the travel squad but he was injured a good bit during camp.

User avatar
AtlAppMan
Posts: 2243
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: ATL
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 1489 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by AtlAppMan » Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:26 pm

JTApps1 wrote:Where are you seeing that we don't have speed?
Stepp said, "I don’t think we’re as explosive as we were last year, but I feel real good about the first seven or eight guys we’ll put out there."

Also about McQuire, “He’s a big, physical kid with outstanding hands,” Stepp said. “He can catch everything thrown his way. He’s not the fastest kid, but what he doesn’t have in speed, he makes up for in great route running and good hands.”

I guess I am just trying to read between the tealeaves. Coaches are typically not going to be too blunt about their messages and that is why I was interpreting that way.

mtnjax
Posts: 1594
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 111 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by mtnjax » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:25 pm

You can't convince me Malachi doesn't have game speed. I watched him juke 2 ISU DB's and leave them in the dust in the final playoff game at KBS

moehler
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:01 am
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by moehler » Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:44 pm

wow, that's kinda scary if Stepp thinks we aren't as explosive compared to last year, we didn't exactly light teams up, alot of short, possession type pass plays.

AppSt94
Posts: 11566
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Huntersville, NC
Has thanked: 7855 times
Been thanked: 4974 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by AppSt94 » Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:50 am

I would be OK with short possession routes. We have an accurate passer and an above average running game. Longer sustained drives would allow the defense (especially the big guys up front) to rest.

User avatar
moonshine
Posts: 2203
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:25 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: High Country
Has thanked: 289 times
Been thanked: 755 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by moonshine » Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:45 am

The staff is having to replace over 1,600 yards receiving by the all time receptions leader and another top 10 all-timer. We have to realize there is a high probability that WR production will see a dip. If the running game can pick up where it left off it will take some of the stress off the young WR corp.
Picked up via free agency by the High Country All-Stars

User avatar
JTApps1
Posts: 2724
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:18 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Belmont
Has thanked: 647 times
Been thanked: 1210 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by JTApps1 » Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:57 am

AtlAppMan wrote:
JTApps1 wrote:Where are you seeing that we don't have speed?
Stepp said, "I don’t think we’re as explosive as we were last year, but I feel real good about the first seven or eight guys we’ll put out there."

Also about McQuire, “He’s a big, physical kid with outstanding hands,” Stepp said. “He can catch everything thrown his way. He’s not the fastest kid, but what he doesn’t have in speed, he makes up for in great route running and good hands.”

I guess I am just trying to read between the tealeaves. Coaches are typically not going to be too blunt about their messages and that is why I was interpreting that way.
I think he was referencing the ability to make big plays since we have so much inexperience compared to Tony and Andrew. On 24/7 Malachi said several guys have more speed than he has seen in his 3 years here.

moehler
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:01 am
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by moehler » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:16 am

Bottom line, several of the young guys are really going to have step up if we are going to be successful, I'm talking 6-8 hundred yds, and 6-7 tds, a lot of pressure on this group to get up to speed really quick.

User avatar
hapapp
Posts: 16976
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 12:48 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Rocky Mount, VA
Has thanked: 2690 times
Been thanked: 3109 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by hapapp » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:49 am

moonshine wrote:The staff is having to replace over 1,600 yards receiving by the all time receptions leader and another top 10 all-timer. We have to realize there is a high probability that WR production will see a dip. If the running game can pick up where it left off it will take some of the stress off the young WR corp.
I agree. The biggest question mark for this App squad is how the passing game will develop with so many inexperienced players stepping in. While there is a lot of young talent, I don't think anyone will make us forget Peacock or Washington overnight. There is still a pretty large learning curve for many of these young guys.

EastHallApp
Posts: 6790
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Raleigh
Has thanked: 3376 times
Been thanked: 2947 times

Re: Looks like Barbour will start at WR

Unread post by EastHallApp » Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:27 pm

Surprised to hear such high praise for Beathard; seems like McElfresh has been the one whose name has come up the most in camp. Guess I'm a bit skeptical whether he'll truly be our #1. And surprised that Meadors would project to redshirt.

Otherwise, this sounds about in line with what's been reported.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”