Duncan and Legends Parking Gone
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 3:18 pm
Saw that Dunan and Legends will no longer be football lots after this year. Holmes will be offline next year with a 500 spot deck in '24.
http://www.yosefscabin.com/forum/
I thought losing Duncan and part of Peacock was going to be because the creek would be daylighted. That would be the opposite of paving paradise. And stadium lot was actually paved. Now at least there’s a nice grassy area in the center of the complex.appdaze wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:06 pmJust losing all the views that the campus once had. From the moment you pass by Wendy's, its high rises as far as the eye can see. Drive through campus and its four floor+ buildings or parking garages everywhere. Walk around the new dorms near the football field, and you have a beautiful view of more dorms.
Google street view still hasn't been updated and still has stadium lot. You can reminisce a bit and enjoy the views. Still has the old field house too. I've said it before that I know progress is inevitable, but that doesn't mean its enjoyable. Paving paradise to put up a parking lot.
Daylighting the creek is a huge win for water quality and the environment. And though I wish the new dorms were not PPP buildings and made to last longer than a a few decades the green area is so much nicer than the huge slab of impermeable asphalt that existed before. As many times as I have walked up the old stadium lot I have no nostalgia for that environmental disaster of a parking lot.goapps93 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:19 pmI thought losing Duncan and part of Peacock was going to be because the creek would be daylighted. That would be the opposite of paving paradise. And stadium lot was actually paved. Now at least there’s a nice grassy area in the center of the complex.appdaze wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:06 pmJust losing all the views that the campus once had. From the moment you pass by Wendy's, its high rises as far as the eye can see. Drive through campus and its four floor+ buildings or parking garages everywhere. Walk around the new dorms near the football field, and you have a beautiful view of more dorms.
Google street view still hasn't been updated and still has stadium lot. You can reminisce a bit and enjoy the views. Still has the old field house too. I've said it before that I know progress is inevitable, but that doesn't mean its enjoyable. Paving paradise to put up a parking lot.
Let’s not pretend like the tiny courtyard between the new buildings that replaced stadium lot is some environmental beacon. It is smaller than duck pond field, so the area nets less pervious surface than before. Replacing a parking lot with dorms isn’t really saving the environment.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 6:42 pmDaylighting the creek is a huge win for water quality and the environment. And though I wish the new dorms were not PPP buildings and made to last longer than a a few decades the green area is so much nicer than the huge slab of impermeable asphalt that existed before. As many times as I have walked up the old stadium lot I have no nostalgia for that environmental disaster of a parking lot.goapps93 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:19 pmI thought losing Duncan and part of Peacock was going to be because the creek would be daylighted. That would be the opposite of paving paradise. And stadium lot was actually paved. Now at least there’s a nice grassy area in the center of the complex.appdaze wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:06 pmJust losing all the views that the campus once had. From the moment you pass by Wendy's, its high rises as far as the eye can see. Drive through campus and its four floor+ buildings or parking garages everywhere. Walk around the new dorms near the football field, and you have a beautiful view of more dorms.
Google street view still hasn't been updated and still has stadium lot. You can reminisce a bit and enjoy the views. Still has the old field house too. I've said it before that I know progress is inevitable, but that doesn't mean its enjoyable. Paving paradise to put up a parking lot.
Those buildings could last as long as anyone wants them to after all Newland Hall is a 80 plus year old frame building with a brick facade. Same for Chappel/Wilson, Smith/Wright and old Doherty. It is many built in the horrible architecture years of 60s, 70s and 80s that need gut remodel or demo.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 6:42 pmDaylighting the creek is a huge win for water quality and the environment. And though I wish the new dorms were not PPP buildings and made to last longer than a a few decades the green area is so much nicer than the huge slab of impermeable asphalt that existed before. As many times as I have walked up the old stadium lot I have no nostalgia for that environmental disaster of a parking lot.goapps93 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:19 pmI thought losing Duncan and part of Peacock was going to be because the creek would be daylighted. That would be the opposite of paving paradise. And stadium lot was actually paved. Now at least there’s a nice grassy area in the center of the complex.appdaze wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:06 pmJust losing all the views that the campus once had. From the moment you pass by Wendy's, its high rises as far as the eye can see. Drive through campus and its four floor+ buildings or parking garages everywhere. Walk around the new dorms near the football field, and you have a beautiful view of more dorms.
Google street view still hasn't been updated and still has stadium lot. You can reminisce a bit and enjoy the views. Still has the old field house too. I've said it before that I know progress is inevitable, but that doesn't mean its enjoyable. Paving paradise to put up a parking lot.
This will alleviate the flooding that routinely occurs because the piping under the asphalt is grossly undersized and the flood water goes across the lot and floods both Rankin and Edwin/Duncan. No Duncan lot means large open flood plane. You can't really think that the plan is creating a hazard??? That's absurd.The Rock wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 8:16 pmLet’s not pretend like the tiny courtyard between the new buildings that replaced stadium lot is some environmental beacon. It is smaller than duck pond field, so the area nets less pervious surface than before. Replacing a parking lot with dorms isn’t really saving the environment.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 6:42 pmDaylighting the creek is a huge win for water quality and the environment. And though I wish the new dorms were not PPP buildings and made to last longer than a a few decades the green area is so much nicer than the huge slab of impermeable asphalt that existed before. As many times as I have walked up the old stadium lot I have no nostalgia for that environmental disaster of a parking lot.goapps93 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:19 pmI thought losing Duncan and part of Peacock was going to be because the creek would be daylighted. That would be the opposite of paving paradise. And stadium lot was actually paved. Now at least there’s a nice grassy area in the center of the complex.appdaze wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:06 pmJust losing all the views that the campus once had. From the moment you pass by Wendy's, its high rises as far as the eye can see. Drive through campus and its four floor+ buildings or parking garages everywhere. Walk around the new dorms near the football field, and you have a beautiful view of more dorms.
Google street view still hasn't been updated and still has stadium lot. You can reminisce a bit and enjoy the views. Still has the old field house too. I've said it before that I know progress is inevitable, but that doesn't mean its enjoyable. Paving paradise to put up a parking lot.
Haven’t seen the whole plan for peacock lot but by daylighting the creek are they creating more of a hazard? Someone drowned in Durham park at one point, is the campus going to be bisected by the stream in the area? This will also change flooding patterns. Where is the water going to go?
Were those dorms surrounded by other 6-story dorms on almost all sides? My main point is about walking around campus and losing all the views due to tall buildings. I'm not really sure what you are referring to by being accurate. I was accurate. I realize it isn't uncharted territory. I never said it wasn't. I think you must have read a different post or something.
Again, I haven't seen the maps or proposals, but do you know for sure the waters in a flood event will be contained to the duncan lot only? And having an open stream at all times is a little more dangerous than the 1-2 times a year there is actually flooding. why not just upsize the pipe or add additional pipes to carry the waters in flood events?HighlandsApp wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 8:38 pmThis will alleviate the flooding that routinely occurs because the piping under the asphalt is grossly undersized and the flood water goes across the lot and floods both Rankin and Edwin/Duncan. No Duncan lot means large open flood plane. You can't really think that the plan is creating a hazard??? That's absurd.The Rock wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 8:16 pmLet’s not pretend like the tiny courtyard between the new buildings that replaced stadium lot is some environmental beacon. It is smaller than duck pond field, so the area nets less pervious surface than before. Replacing a parking lot with dorms isn’t really saving the environment.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 6:42 pmDaylighting the creek is a huge win for water quality and the environment. And though I wish the new dorms were not PPP buildings and made to last longer than a a few decades the green area is so much nicer than the huge slab of impermeable asphalt that existed before. As many times as I have walked up the old stadium lot I have no nostalgia for that environmental disaster of a parking lot.goapps93 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:19 pmI thought losing Duncan and part of Peacock was going to be because the creek would be daylighted. That would be the opposite of paving paradise. And stadium lot was actually paved. Now at least there’s a nice grassy area in the center of the complex.appdaze wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:06 pmJust losing all the views that the campus once had. From the moment you pass by Wendy's, its high rises as far as the eye can see. Drive through campus and its four floor+ buildings or parking garages everywhere. Walk around the new dorms near the football field, and you have a beautiful view of more dorms.
Google street view still hasn't been updated and still has stadium lot. You can reminisce a bit and enjoy the views. Still has the old field house too. I've said it before that I know progress is inevitable, but that doesn't mean its enjoyable. Paving paradise to put up a parking lot.
Haven’t seen the whole plan for peacock lot but by daylighting the creek are they creating more of a hazard? Someone drowned in Durham park at one point, is the campus going to be bisected by the stream in the area? This will also change flooding patterns. Where is the water going to go?
I'm sorry I was so rough on you on my reply. Apparently there are engineers that have devised all these plans that will actually alleviate and hopefully solve the problem and both the university and the town of Boone as well as some different water conservatory groups have been working on this and attempting to get federal funding to assist in the cost.The Rock wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 7:16 amAgain, I haven't seen the maps or proposals, but do you know for sure the waters in a flood event will be contained to the duncan lot only? And having an open stream at all times is a little more dangerous than the 1-2 times a year there is actually flooding. why not just upsize the pipe or add additional pipes to carry the waters in flood events?HighlandsApp wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 8:38 pmThis will alleviate the flooding that routinely occurs because the piping under the asphalt is grossly undersized and the flood water goes across the lot and floods both Rankin and Edwin/Duncan. No Duncan lot means large open flood plane. You can't really think that the plan is creating a hazard??? That's absurd.The Rock wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 8:16 pmLet’s not pretend like the tiny courtyard between the new buildings that replaced stadium lot is some environmental beacon. It is smaller than duck pond field, so the area nets less pervious surface than before. Replacing a parking lot with dorms isn’t really saving the environment.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 25, 2022 6:42 pmDaylighting the creek is a huge win for water quality and the environment. And though I wish the new dorms were not PPP buildings and made to last longer than a a few decades the green area is so much nicer than the huge slab of impermeable asphalt that existed before. As many times as I have walked up the old stadium lot I have no nostalgia for that environmental disaster of a parking lot.
Haven’t seen the whole plan for peacock lot but by daylighting the creek are they creating more of a hazard? Someone drowned in Durham park at one point, is the campus going to be bisected by the stream in the area? This will also change flooding patterns. Where is the water going to go?
Also, can we stop pretending App is some model for green development or environmental resources? None of their buildings are built with sustainability in mind and they do nothing to alleviate the flooding problems they contribute to the town. They use no permeable pavement/pavers, they install no stormwater detention systems. at least they haven't willingly in the past, maybe Town of Boone required it with latest round of development through PPP when App actually had to go through TOB for permitting