Evans

NewApp
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1018 times
Been thanked: 949 times
Contact:

Evans

Unread post by NewApp » Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:19 pm

Why was Evans being stopped at the line so much last night? He didn't seem to have his usual explosive game. Were they keying on him?
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX

Rick83
Posts: 2766
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:00 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 2040 times
Been thanked: 1628 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by Rick83 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:22 pm

NewApp wrote:
Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:19 pm
Why was Evans being stopped at the line so much last night? He didn't seem to have his usual explosive game. Were they keying on him?
Seems like I recall hearing Napier say they had to stop Evans to win.

User avatar
McLeansvilleAppFan
Posts: 9539
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
Has thanked: 4473 times
Been thanked: 2247 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by McLeansvilleAppFan » Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:29 pm

Yes, I think so which opened up some of the early passing, though that did not hold the entire night either.
This is my very generic signature added to each post.

User avatar
CheckYosef94
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:49 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Cleveland, NC
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 260 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by CheckYosef94 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:31 pm

Probably a mixture if Louisiana having a great rushing defense and them knowing he's a weapon and focusing on limiting him.
The mountains are calling and I must go

User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 8481
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1693 times
Been thanked: 2252 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by biggie » Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:35 pm

They seemed to be stacking the box, a lot of single coverage on the WRs.

User avatar
appstatealum
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:45 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Charlotte/Gastonia
Has thanked: 3526 times
Been thanked: 1932 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by appstatealum » Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:38 pm

NewApp wrote:
Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:19 pm
Why was Evans being stopped at the line so much last night? He didn't seem to have his usual explosive game. Were they keying on him?
They pretty much stacked the box with 8 man fronts the entire game. Drink has fallen in love with controlling the clock (rightfully so, i guess) and he decided that as long as we were getting 3+ yards a clip, he could control the coverages and clock. We rotated 4 RBs the entire game, which told me Drinks plan was to "Floyd Mayweather" UL to death last night. As I referenced in another thread, we had plenty of things open with the way they sold out on Evans and Henni, Drink just kept jabbing with the run game.

I've heard that Drink has an obsession with Belichick, and im starting to see the parallels, on and off the field. He knew he had single coverage opportunities all game with Sutton and he didnt pull that spade out until the moment he needed it. Somebody referenced that they shouldnt have counted on getting a PI on that moment, but the reality is Sutton is either going to catch that, he is going to get a PI, or Zac is going to make a bad throw. Drink had set it up the whole drive and played the percentages knowing that Corey would do his part. The only gamble was if Zac would throw a catch-able ball.
The Appalachian State

Rick83
Posts: 2766
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:00 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 2040 times
Been thanked: 1628 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by Rick83 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:41 pm

The yards he did get were hard-fought and not the break out runs he's accustomed to. Gotta believe he's pretty sore today, that goes for Zac as well between the sacks and hits on his runs. Glad we have the extra days after this game before next Saturday.

Yosefus
Posts: 2066
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 11:50 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 787 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by Yosefus » Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:57 pm

There were times the 8 man box was literally like a 15 foot wide wall with all red on one side and white a yellow on the other. Pretty impressed we got yards at all, and that it took almost the entire 4th quarter to wear them down. We beat a pretty dang good football program last night.

User avatar
App91
Posts: 3828
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:28 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 671 times
Been thanked: 480 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by App91 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:15 pm

Could not watch, but did La-La rotate D Linemen?

appbio91
Posts: 2490
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:00 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 468 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by appbio91 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 5:35 pm

appstatealum wrote:
Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:38 pm
NewApp wrote:
Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:19 pm
Why was Evans being stopped at the line so much last night? He didn't seem to have his usual explosive game. Were they keying on him?
They pretty much stacked the box with 8 man fronts the entire game. Drink has fallen in love with controlling the clock (rightfully so, i guess) and he decided that as long as we were getting 3+ yards a clip, he could control the coverages and clock. We rotated 4 RBs the entire game, which told me Drinks plan was to "Floyd Mayweather" UL to death last night. As I referenced in another thread, we had plenty of things open with the way they sold out on Evans and Henni, Drink just kept jabbing with the run game.

I've heard that Drink has an obsession with Belichick, and im starting to see the parallels, on and off the field. He knew he had single coverage opportunities all game with Sutton and he didnt pull that spade out until the moment he needed it. Somebody referenced that they shouldnt have counted on getting a PI on that moment, but the reality is Sutton is either going to catch that, he is going to get a PI, or Zac is going to make a bad throw. Drink had set it up the whole drive and played the percentages knowing that Corey would do his part. The only gamble was if Zac would throw a catch-able ball.
Or get sacked like he did multiple times, I agree it was a great call at the right time but the pucker factor was sky high in my recliner

User avatar
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09
Posts: 3137
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 2:05 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Virginia
Has thanked: 653 times
Been thanked: 1767 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by /\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 5:38 pm

We ran the stretch play too many times IMO. Not saying we rush for 500 yards without running the stretch, but it had a very low success rate last night.
Twitter: @brosef_yosef

User avatar
Rekdiver
Posts: 7736
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1506 times
Been thanked: 3910 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by Rekdiver » Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:15 pm

I kept waiting for a Virgil reverse..... or the Jet sweep.

Appstate88
Posts: 2653
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:38 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 1430 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by Appstate88 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:35 pm

Their job number 1 was to stop our runningbacks. They stopped us by crashing down on Evans but that meant QB1 was free to run.
GIVE 'EM HELL APPS!

appgrad95&97
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 1:07 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 477 times
Been thanked: 642 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by appgrad95&97 » Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:51 pm

I'm no expert, but to me it looked like we won because they focused on him, which allowed Zack to make some decisive runs.

NewApp
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1018 times
Been thanked: 949 times
Contact:

Re: Evans

Unread post by NewApp » Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:52 am

Perhaps another reason we won was because our defense held them to one TD.
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX

BUTCH1991
Posts: 2670
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:53 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: High Point
Has thanked: 1830 times
Been thanked: 1016 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by BUTCH1991 » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:42 am

Or perhaps we won because we had more points than they did.

User avatar
HighPointApp
Posts: 3594
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:15 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1484 times
Been thanked: 562 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by HighPointApp » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:08 am

BUTCH1991 wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:42 am
Or perhaps we won because we had more points than they did.

Or our Coach drank more Diet Mt Dew.......
Give 'em Hell!
Class of ‘96

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:20 am

I think we also proved (again) that we have too many weapons and there is no way to beat us by keying on just one aspect and hope that the others don't work. La could be the toughest remaining opponent on our schedule and we really beat them pretty good. I still believe that we could have scored at least one more TD but a win is a win.

Stonewall
Posts: 7130
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 3456 times
Been thanked: 4310 times

Re: Evans

Unread post by Stonewall » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:42 am

He didn't have a lot of daylight to run to...

NewApp
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1018 times
Been thanked: 949 times
Contact:

Re: Evans

Unread post by NewApp » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:49 am

BUTCH1991 wrote:
Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:42 am
Or perhaps we won because we had more points than they did.

That's a possibility. lol
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”