Conference tie-breakers


WataugaMan
Posts: 3972
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:17 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1408 times
Been thanked: 1083 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by WataugaMan » Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:36 am

Seems we need to pull for Vermin over El Cid this weekend.

User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Posts: 7250
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:20 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: State of Appalachian
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by ASUMountaineer » Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:14 am

WataugaMan wrote:Seems we need to pull for Vermin over El Cid this weekend.
That seems to indicate that once the three-team tie is broken, it reverts back to head-to-head. Does anyone else read scenarios 1 and 2 that way?
Poster formerly known as AppState03 (MMB) and currently known as ASUMountaineer everywhere else.

AppAlum1
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 6:18 am
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by AppAlum1 » Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:30 am

ASUMountaineer wrote:
WataugaMan wrote:Seems we need to pull for Vermin over El Cid this weekend.
That seems to indicate that once the three-team tie is broken, it reverts back to head-to-head. Does anyone else read scenarios 1 and 2 that way?
No. That was not my reading. But, it really won't matter here. Both GaSo & App will make the playoffs. The AQ will not affect who they play in the playoffs.

I believe Woffie will also make the playoffs. But, if any of the three teams could benefit from the AQ, Woffie should get it. That makes too much sense ... plus, they lost to Sammie.

In the mean time, the SoCon needs to amend the rules to be more clear and less ambiguous. I'll hold my breath.

User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Posts: 7250
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:20 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: State of Appalachian
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by ASUMountaineer » Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:52 pm

AppAlum1 wrote:
ASUMountaineer wrote:
WataugaMan wrote:Seems we need to pull for Vermin over El Cid this weekend.
That seems to indicate that once the three-team tie is broken, it reverts back to head-to-head. Does anyone else read scenarios 1 and 2 that way?
No. That was not my reading. But, it really won't matter here. Both GaSo & App will make the playoffs. The AQ will not affect who they play in the playoffs.

I believe Woffie will also make the playoffs. But, if any of the three teams could benefit from the AQ, Woffie should get it. That makes too much sense ... plus, they lost to Sammie.

In the mean time, the SoCon needs to amend the rules to be more clear and less ambiguous. I'll hold my breath.
This is what I was referencing. It seems to refer to the process reverting back to head-to-head once the three-way tie is broken. Perhaps I'm misreading it.
1. Chattanooga and The Citadel both lose — Appalachian gets the automatic bid. (Wofford is out of the tiebreaker because of the loss to Samford. Appalachian State won the head-to-head against Georgia Southern.)
Based on others interpretations, head-to-head will not come into play. As for the SoCon amending the rules...clearly it needs to happen, and it almost as clearly won't happen. :|
Poster formerly known as AppState03 (MMB) and currently known as ASUMountaineer everywhere else.

AppinVA
Posts: 14332
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 9:41 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 3623 times
Been thanked: 3403 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by AppinVA » Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:48 pm

It beats the tiebreaking procedure I figured the league would have.

1. In the event a public school is tied with a public school, the tie goes to the public school with the lowest enrollment.
a. If enrollment numbers are equal (or over 15,000), the tie goes to the school with the higher SAT average. (this is how we weren't called for that safety against Georgia Southern)
b. If a private school is close enough to the tied public schools in terms of record that the league can somehow come up with a formula to give the tie to the private school.
2. In the event a public school is tied with a private school, the tie goes to the private school.
3. In the event a public school is tied with a private school with a higher enrollment, the tie goes to the school with the higher tuition.
4. In the event a private school is tied with a private school, the tie goes to the school with the lowest enrollment, unless.
a. The private school with the higher enrollment number is in the Northwest corner of South Carolina.
b. If the two private schools have equal numbers of enrollment, the tie goes to the school with the highest tuition.
c. If both numbers are equal, and if the school is located in the Northwest corner of South Carolina, the tie goes to the school with the highest average SAT scores.
"Some people call me hillbilly. Some people call me mountain man. You can call me Appalachian. Appalachian's what I am."-- Del McCoury Band

AppAlum1
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 6:18 am
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by AppAlum1 » Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:01 pm

AppinVA wrote:It beats the tiebreaking procedure I figured the league would have.

1. In the event a public school is tied with a public school, the tie goes to the public school with the lowest enrollment.
a. If enrollment numbers are equal (or over 15,000), the tie goes to the school with the higher SAT average. (this is how we weren't called for that safety against Georgia Southern)
b. If a private school is close enough to the tied public schools in terms of record that the league can somehow come up with a formula to give the tie to the private school.
2. In the event a public school is tied with a private school, the tie goes to the private school.
3. In the event a public school is tied with a private school with a higher enrollment, the tie goes to the school with the higher tuition.
4. In the event a private school is tied with a private school, the tie goes to the school with the lowest enrollment, unless.
a. The private school with the higher enrollment number is in the Northwest corner of South Carolina.
b. If the two private schools have equal numbers of enrollment, the tie goes to the school with the highest tuition.
c. If both numbers are equal, and if the school is located in the Northwest corner of South Carolina, the tie goes to the school with the highest average SAT scores.

Now, now. The rules as they are are funny enough without such shenanigans as you suggest. How dare you! LOL

User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Posts: 7250
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:20 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: State of Appalachian
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by ASUMountaineer » Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:44 pm

AppinVA wrote:It beats the tiebreaking procedure I figured the league would have.

1. In the event a public school is tied with a public school, the tie goes to the public school with the lowest enrollment.
a. If enrollment numbers are equal (or over 15,000), the tie goes to the school with the higher SAT average. (this is how we weren't called for that safety against Georgia Southern)
b. If a private school is close enough to the tied public schools in terms of record that the league can somehow come up with a formula to give the tie to the private school.
2. In the event a public school is tied with a private school, the tie goes to the private school.
3. In the event a public school is tied with a private school with a higher enrollment, the tie goes to the school with the higher tuition.
4. In the event a private school is tied with a private school, the tie goes to the school with the lowest enrollment, unless.
a. The private school with the higher enrollment number is in the Northwest corner of South Carolina.
b. If the two private schools have equal numbers of enrollment, the tie goes to the school with the highest tuition.
c. If both numbers are equal, and if the school is located in the Northwest corner of South Carolina, the tie goes to the school with the highest average SAT scores.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Poster formerly known as AppState03 (MMB) and currently known as ASUMountaineer everywhere else.

User avatar
mom_n_buggie
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:10 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by mom_n_buggie » Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:01 pm

NEW SoCon Rule:

In the event of a conference tie, the tie goes to the school with the highest elevation.

User avatar
BeauFoster
Posts: 6871
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:42 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: In a cubicle
Has thanked: 1746 times
Been thanked: 2165 times

Re: Conference tie-breakers

Unread post by BeauFoster » Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:12 pm

AppinVA wrote:It beats the tiebreaking procedure I figured the league would have.

1. In the event a public school is tied with a public school, the tie goes to the public school with the lowest enrollment.
a. If enrollment numbers are equal (or over 15,000), the tie goes to the school with the higher SAT average. (this is how we weren't called for that safety against Georgia Southern)
b. If a private school is close enough to the tied public schools in terms of record that the league can somehow come up with a formula to give the tie to the private school.
2. In the event a public school is tied with a private school, the tie goes to the private school.
3. In the event a public school is tied with a private school with a higher enrollment, the tie goes to the school with the higher tuition.
4. In the event a private school is tied with a private school, the tie goes to the school with the lowest enrollment, unless.
a. The private school with the higher enrollment number is in the Northwest corner of South Carolina.
b. If the two private schools have equal numbers of enrollment, the tie goes to the school with the highest tuition.
c. If both numbers are equal, and if the school is located in the Northwest corner of South Carolina, the tie goes to the school with the highest average SAT scores.
This is beyond fantastic. Kudos!
Give 'em hell!

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”