I would think that's the case with any kicker.AppSt94 wrote:It didn't stop some from saying he was the answer. As for the #8 kicker rating. It is impressive and well deserved but I just want him to put it through the uprights. If he can do that then I don't really care what he is ranked.ASUPATCH wrote:At no point during Matics recruitment was he ever the #8 kicker. Or offered by Penn State. Slightly different level of player IMO.AppSt94 wrote:Not directed at you but generally speaking. The same was being said of Matics when he committed.appgrad wrote:Yeah - this is the one component the '05-'07 teams had that we are sorely missing. Of course - we didn't have to punt much back then either!AppSt94 wrote:Until we get the Special Teams cleaned up then a complete team is not in the discussion. I like that our offense is very balanced and our defense play has improved as the competition as gotten better.
Still - we turned games a few times on special teams. Michigan, obviously, and Furman '06. I agree with whoever said having all these Freshman and Redshirt Freshman coming in next year, hungry for playing time, will help tremendously. Hopefully, the kicker recruit we have coming in is the real deal, and we get rid of the rugby punts.
Sepcial teams can make such a difference in college, almost solely based on the fact that so many teams are so bad at it...and don't spend any time on it. Focusing on being good at it will give us a big edge, I think.
The ranking is just a measurement.