Clemson is definitely a superior team. However, I can't help but think of all the ways we shot ourselves in the foot during the 2nd quarter. That 20 point + swing wasn't the result of us playig them straight up, rather them capitalizing on our poor coaching decisions/plays (performance) I.e. 3 chances at a FG, pick 6, INt in endzone and INt in just about the clemson redzone. Arguably, our D had no say in those points (save the FG).NewApp wrote:I don't see what all the criticism of the coaching staff and players is all about. We lost to the 12th ranked team in the country.
All of that said, do I think we would have won? probably not. But I do think it would have been a much more respectable game, performance wise, had we taken care of ourseleves like Satterfield preached thoughout the week. Unfortunately, we had multiple mental lapses in the 2nd quarter that determined the outcome of the entire game.